To: 11th_VA
Sounds like they're trying to make a deal.
We'll remove the "Assault weapons" proposition if you'll go along with Red Flag laws, limited number of weapons you can buy laws, Universal background check laws... on and on and on.
2 posted on
01/13/2020 11:22:05 AM PST by
grobdriver
(BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
To: grobdriver
And then come back for the “assault weapon” ban..
5 posted on
01/13/2020 11:23:55 AM PST by
gundog
( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
To: grobdriver
34 posted on
01/13/2020 12:38:08 PM PST by
Eleutheria5
("SHUT UP!" he explained.)
To: grobdriver
grobdriver wrote:
“...Red Flag laws, limited number of weapons you can buy laws, Universal background check laws. ...”
Not just NO, but Oh h3ll NO to those also!
40 posted on
01/13/2020 1:13:32 PM PST by
WildHighlander57
((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)
To: grobdriver
Not any sort of compromise at all. It boils down to were going to take all your food and let you starve ok well only take 3/4ths of your food now and come back for the rest later. Gun owners get nothing in this deal
49 posted on
01/13/2020 3:37:05 PM PST by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: grobdriver
We'll remove the "Assault weapons" proposition if you'll go along with Red Flag laws, limited number of weapons you can buy laws, Universal background check laws... on and on and on.It's called "Boiling the frog."
Our side should counter with Constitutional Carry and no new laws.
55 posted on
01/13/2020 6:14:13 PM PST by
Oatka
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson