This is the second time you have tried to smear me with an answer related to reinstating alcohol prohibition, when it was not related to an objection to legalizing narcotics. In other comments on this thread I addressed specifically the reasons why I do not think making all narcotics legal is a good idea.
Sorry you didn’t have the tools to be able to grasp that.
But it is related: when one argues that narcotics should be illegal because they're harmful, and also states that alcohol is harmful, one acquires a logical obligation to either support the illegality of alcohol or give an actual explanation of why not.