Let’s Wrap This FReepathon Up, Folks … Donate Today!
Posted on 12/21/2019 2:18:05 PM PST by jazusamo
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) is emerging as the most important vote in the Senate battle over President Trump’s impeachment trial, as Democrats regard her support as key to getting the additional witnesses and documents they need to build their case.
Collins, who has played a pivotal role in the biggest Senate debates of the Trump era, finds herself once again in the spotlight as one of the Republicans considered most likely to side with Democrats.
“She’s an important player,” said Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who noted that while every Senate vote is important, key trial questions will be decided by a handful of lawmakers.
“Four Republicans can bring this back to a bipartisan position,” he said.
Collins cast pivotal votes to defeat legislation to repeal ObamaCare in 2017 and to confirm Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2018.
Partisan lines have become so entrenched in the Senate that only a handful of senators are considered potential defectors on contentious votes.
Sen. Debbie Stabenow (Mich.), chairwoman of the Senate Democratic Policy and Communications Committee, said there’s “no question” that Collins will be a pivotal vote. She cited Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) as another potential swing vote.
But Stabenow said fellow senators don’t know what to expect from Collins, who has kept her cards close to the vest.
“That is one of the big questions at this point,” she said. “We’re getting no indication at all.”
A Democratic senator who requested anonymity said the Democratic caucus is most focused on Collins and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska).
“Susan Collins and Lisa are key. Everyone is watching them because Susan is up for reelection and we all know what the party did to Lisa, so she has an interest in being independent,” the senator said.
In 2010, Murkowski lost the Alaska GOP Senate primary but won the general election as a write-in candidate.
When asked by The Hill whether she’s experiencing a sense of déjà vu about being the center of attention, Collins replied: “That’s not what I’m seeking to be, I’m just trying to do my job.”
A Senate source familiar with Collins’s thinking said the senator will likely play a significantly different role than during the Kavanaugh debate when she joined with other moderates such as Murkowski, then-Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), then-Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) to call for an FBI investigation into sexual assault allegations confronting Kavanaugh before his nomination went forward.
Collins is not expected to once again form a rump group with fellow Senate moderates to demand more information relevant to the articles of impeachment against Trump, the source said.
Moderate Democrats such as Sens. Christopher Coons (Del.) and Manchin confirmed that there has been little in the way of formal discussions among the centrists about what the rules for the Senate trial should be.
Another difference this time: Collins will play the role of Senate arbiter while also facing a potentially competitive primary and general election in the same year.
“She would definitely have a primary challenger if she did break ranks with the Republicans,” said Janet Martin, a professor of government at Bowdoin College in Maine.
Martin said Maine has a strong Tea Party faction, particularly in the state’s rural 2nd Congressional District, that could mobilize against Collins if she votes with Democrats on crucial procedural votes.
Collins witnessed the strength of Maine’s Tea Party activists in 2010 when they took control of the state Republican Party convention to adopt an aggressive platform that called for radical changes such as sealing the nation’s borders and eliminating the Department of Education and the Federal Reserve.
Trump visited Maine four times during the 2016 campaign in hopes of winning one of Maine’s electoral votes. Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton ended up narrowly carrying the state by 2.5 percentage points but won only three of its four electors.
Maine’s Senate Republican primary won’t be held until June 9, giving a potential opponent plenty of time to wage a campaign based on her impeachment votes.
Another important consideration for Collins is that she’s in line to become the next Republican chairwoman of the powerful Appropriations Committee, as Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) will eventually reach the end of his panel term limit and Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) will retire at the end of next year.
Collins hinted during an interview with Maine news radio WGAN that she has the Appropriations gavel in mind.
“But for my position on the Appropriations Committee, a committee that I’d be in line to chair if I’m reelected, I would not be able to accomplish those goals for the state of Maine. It makes a real difference,” she said, citing her work on the military widows’ tax, community development funding and a new ship for the Maine Maritime Academy.
Who becomes the next Appropriations chair is largely determined by seniority but the selection must be ratified by a vote of the entire Senate GOP conference, and there’s a chance that Trump would oppose her ascension if she voted to convict him on articles of impeachment or dealt him a significant procedural setback on witnesses or documents.
Republican senators are confident Collins will stick with them on their initial demand that the question of whether to subpoena additional witnesses and documents should wait until after the impeachment managers and Trump’s defense team present their arguments.
“It seems near unanimous, if it’s not unanimous,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) of the view that the opening phase of Trump’s Senate trial should follow the precedent set by former President Clinton’s 1999 trial.
Yet Democrats think they have a chance of picking up Collins on key impeachment votes, speculating she might be trying to burnish her centrist credentials after feeling a public backlash for voting to confirm Kavanaugh last year.
“I think the Kavanaugh vote, in talking to some people who are more familiar with her staff, is something that has been distressful because of the reaction that has come about,” Martin said.
Democrats and allied liberal groups are making her Kavanaugh vote one of their central talking points ahead of the Maine Senate race.
Emily’s List, a Democratic-allied group, circulated a fundraising email Friday highlighting Collins’s statement that since the bitter Supreme Court fight of 2018 she doesn’t regret her vote “in the least.”
I wonder if Turban Durbin believes in the tooth faerie too.
WISHFUL THINKING from The Hill.
The 24 hour Democrat propaganda service called The Hill is always shilling for their party favorites. And every damn thing they write can be found on Free Republic.
L8r
Exactly!
This is TheHillofTrash advocating and propagandizing rather than reporting.
What fantasyland is this from?
“Four Republicans can bring this back to a bipartisan position,” he said.
They are posting this article as a way to bring pressure on those Rs.
It’s desperate but if i were leftist I would print it.
At least all the outlets are showing their true colors WAY MORE than in the past.
And in the past they were pretty bad too
And it was the extreme leftist Democrat hack who said that.
LOL!
Collins— a weak sister. Try tempting Murkowski from AK perhaps a weaker sister. Dont forget to use the snake and apple routine.
Yup. It's definitely a push-piece.
In their dreams. Democrats refused GOP minority demands in the House for due process.
Now all of a sudden they want bipartisanship? Hell, no! Let’s give them a taste of their own medicine.
Revenge is a dish best served cold.
Let’s Wrap This FReepathon Up, Folks … Donate Today!
Unfortunately certain persons are very susceptible to the ass kissing that in this article is dramatically less subtle than usual
She will play no role as there will be no trial!
Bottom line McConnell needs to do what Mark Levin suggested and end this stupid mess.
Calling Chris Coons a moderate is a total misnomer. He’s a Schumer lapdog whose greatest contribution to the Kavanaugh hearing was declaring the judge to be guilty until proven innocent. Total piece of work who I’ll be glad to vote against in 2020.
And the Senate hasn’t decided what the rules shall be.
They may decide on whatever rules they like just like the house did.
It is entirely possible and certainly within the realm of the constitution to have the charges placed in the hands of a prosecution team to be appointed by the senate.
What mind altering drug are these people using to even come up with such a scenario?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.