Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; BillyBoy; LS; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; campaignPete R-CT
I'm seeing conflicting information about the existing GOP field in the race for Van Drew's seat. On another thread, they claimed the GOP frontrunner for the nomination is a "friend of the Bidens" and has been very critical of Trump in the past. In that case, it makes it sound its better to hold our nose for Van Drew and hope for the best.

But when I went to Bob Patterson, Brian Fitzherbert, and David Richter's websites (not sure which of them is considered the "leading" Republican challenger), they all seem to be significantly to the right of Van Drew and solid conservatives who want to work with the President. Bob Patterson says he was honored to work in the Trump administration, Brian Fitzherbert says President Trump has "done an excellent job of kick-starting our national economy", and David Richter says he's a lifelong Republican who wants to go to Washington to help Trump drain the swamp there.

For comparison:

https://bobpattersonforcongress.com/
https://www.fitzherbertforcongress.com/
https://richter2020.com/

If all three of them stay in the race, its possible they will ironically help Van Drew get the GOP nomination by splitting the anti-incumbent vote.

Van Drew is a traditional reliable RAT vote on a lot of issues (for example, he has always gloated about being strongly pro-abortion). It will be interesting to see if he flip-flops on those issues overnight to market himself in a Republican primary.

Even in a worse case scenario, I agree that Van Drew seems to be an improvement over the RINOish Frank LoBiondo. I always take stuff like that into account, whether the party switcher is an improvement over the previous occupant. LIEberman was awful but the "Republican" he defeated to win his seat was so bad a lot of Republicans cheered on Lieberman. I never warmed to Zig Zag Zell Miller because even on his best day of stabbing "his" party in the back, he was still significantly LESS conservative than the Republican he replaced, Paul Coverdell. It would have been different if Zell Miller had been appointed to replace an odious RAT Senator like Chuck Schumer. If that had been the case, I'd be cheering him on, too.

Oh, and in a final vote, Van Drew switching essentially cancels out that goofball Justin Amash leaving. The difference is that Van Drew is voting the way his constituents want. Amash represents a safe Republican district that voted for Trump and used to be held by Vern Ehlers, so he just voting the way Nancy Pelosi wants in spite of his constituents. I hope that turd gets flushed in the next election cycle.

138 posted on 12/14/2019 7:36:51 PM PST by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: BillyBoy

My guess is that other than abortion, he “will grow” into some GOP positions. But abortion is a never-changer for these people.

Right now, however, in the House we need the seats. As you say, this cancels A(monster)mash, whose seat we can actually retake.

We need about 15 more. I think we will get OK5 and the Andy Kim seat in NJ back. Possibly Torres-Small in NM, and I’m pretty confident Burgess Owens will get back UT4. So maybe another 13 flips.


143 posted on 12/15/2019 5:21:17 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson