Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gahanna Bob

Maybe I don’t understand the article, but I don’t see winning here — yet. Maybe later, depending on how SCOTUS rules ...?


37 posted on 12/13/2019 2:48:46 PM PST by MayflowerMadam ("I've read the back of The Book, and we win.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: MayflowerMadam

The stay of the lower court rulings are the win. Those opinions will be reversed. SCOTUS wouldn’t have taken the cases if they weren’t concerned about the precedent of those rulings.


39 posted on 12/13/2019 2:54:49 PM PST by Gahanna Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: MayflowerMadam

Maybe I don’t understand the article, but I don’t see winning here — yet. Maybe later, depending on how SCOTUS rules ...?


That represents a fair understanding.


128 posted on 12/14/2019 9:17:19 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: MayflowerMadam

Maybe I don’t understand the article, but I don’t see winning here — yet. Maybe later, depending on how SCOTUS rules ...?


That represents a fair understanding.

I think the argument here though is about other concepts, like the one that the courts are the arbitrators of this stuff - which in-effect slams the Obstruction of Congress charge yet again.


129 posted on 12/14/2019 9:18:51 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson