Maybe I don’t understand the article, but I don’t see winning here — yet. Maybe later, depending on how SCOTUS rules ...?
The stay of the lower court rulings are the win. Those opinions will be reversed. SCOTUS wouldn’t have taken the cases if they weren’t concerned about the precedent of those rulings.
Maybe I dont understand the article, but I dont see winning here yet. Maybe later, depending on how SCOTUS rules ...?
Maybe I dont understand the article, but I dont see winning here yet. Maybe later, depending on how SCOTUS rules ...?
I think the argument here though is about other concepts, like the one that the courts are the arbitrators of this stuff - which in-effect slams the Obstruction of Congress charge yet again.