[Bruce Campbells Chin]

I actually think this is a good move. I don’t think putting Schiff in front of a microphone is a good idea. It may sound nice in theory to hammer him with questions, but he won’t answer them directly and will just keep hitting his own narrative. And hte press would love nothing more than to show Schiff repeating their themes rather than putting on the testimony of other witnesses.

[MayflowerMadam]

“I don’t think putting Schiff in front of a microphone is a good idea.”

If he would tell the truth I’d be for it, but he NEVER tells the truth, and his position gives him immunity for lying. It would be a waste of time.

[AndyJackson]

but he won’t answer them directly and will just keep hitting his own narrative

Not treated as a hostile witness with a good lawyer and a good judge he won't.

[lodi90]

I actually think this is a good move. I don’t think putting Schiff in front of a microphone is a good idea. It may sound nice in theory to hammer him with questions, but he won’t answer them directly and will just keep hitting his own narrative. And hte press would love nothing more than to show Schiff repeating their themes rather than putting on the testimony of other witnesses.

---

Schiff is a red herring here. He’s already said he won’t testify in the Senate.

What’s really going on here is Graham is despicably floating the idea of the GOP controlled Senate not allowing POTUS to defend himself in the Senate. Defend that if you want. I won’t be.

[rollo tomasi]

Perjury traps would be so easy to set just by asking yes and no questions, not sure what you are getting at.

Schiff-for-brains can't pick and choose when to plead the 5th so his narrative along with his public career will easily be destroyed.

Graham is protecting the Statist class along with the corruption that class causes.