The “blackmail” is not in evidence. It’s speculation as to why he ruled as he did. If he was blackmailed, it was by the Obama administration. They are no longer in power. If it could be proven, he should have been impeached. It didn’t happen then. It’s too late to bellyache. He’s the presiding judge.
You could do worse. In Buffalo, there used to be a judge named Judge Harry Forehead. No joke. He was a lush and a horrible jurist. I’ve seen trials where a judge was making nasty gestures while the plaintiff’s attorney spoke, who rushed the attorneys through summation, because he had to fly home to watch a ballgame, and another who gave ridiculous rulings that a 1st year law student would know was wrong, in order to pressure the sides to settle.
Judge Roberts is the hand we’ve been dealt. No option other than to play it well.
Dear sir, I know you are not naive. just as a police officer is aware of an illegal gun on a suspect, but cannot prove it, so are many of us aware of this blackmail. Even his fellow SCOTUS members were shocked at his sudden reversal, and if you recall his announcement of his decision on live TV, you will remember his obvious discomfort -- nay, desperation!
If he was blackmailed, it was by the Obama administration. They are no longer in power.
Do you think for one second the apparatus behind the Obamanation is disassembled? Tell me you do not believe this.
If it could be proven, he should have been impeached. It didn’t happen then.
That's the thing about blackmail: To prove it, you must admit (or have external forces disclose) the thing you are trying to hide.
It’s too late to bellyache. He’s the presiding judge.....Judge Roberts is the hand we’ve been dealt. No option other than to play it well.
This is the only thing we can agree upon.
However, do not count me as terribly hopeful the truth will out.