Posted on 12/04/2019 9:41:30 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
On Wednesday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said he would vote for impeachment because the Democrats “have credibly argued” that President Donald Trump has obstructed Congress.
Napolitano said, “I believe that the Democrats have credibly argued that he committed impeachable offenses. The easiest one, because this existed in Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton — is obstruction of Congress.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
““I believe that the Democrats have credibly argued that he committed impeachable offenses. The easiest one, because this existed in Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton — is obstruction of Congress.””
Tha fuq?
You could have impeached George Washington and Thomas Jefferson on that flimsy horseship.
Has his Depends in a bunch because Trump would not make him a Judge
What a petty little man, they all have that I’ll show you attitude when they think they were crossed by someone. I am sure President Trump ment what he said and put him on the list, but then discovered he fell short on qualifications.
Hell of a judge, doesn’t have all the actual supposed evidence, no need to here any defense witnesses or cross examination, he can come to a decision of guilty just like that! I wonder if he ran a kangaroo court too when he was sitting on the bench. And people said/say this A$$hat is conservative? Hell of a judge......
OF COURSE the miserable little backstabbing slimeball would vote that way.
he’s revealed his true nature for several months already
Stubborn as a mule is a good term for this kind of behavior
I bet he would.......what a little turd
I bet he would.......what a little turd
What a total bundle of sticks.
The loser must have said this before Turley took the rats to the cleaners.
The butthurt is strong in this one.
Obstruction? when the whole basis for the Dems accustaions are over interpretations of phone calls and quid pro quos?
Ask Obammy and Clinton about quid pro quos, they usually pay off very well for Dems.
How much did all the key players get paid by Russians for Uranium 1’s 20% stake?
Trump relies heavily on the advice of the Heritage Foundation in the selection process for Supreme Court justices.
I can assure you that a disgruntled misfit from New Jersey who served as the equivalent of a traffic court judge for less than a decade wouldn't even make that organization's list of prospective Supreme Court nominees if the list had two million names on it.
What a surprise!/s. Well thankfully, we’ll never have to worry about that, will we nappy?
I frequently disagree with FOX news personalities, but, unlike the MSM, they DO show BOTH sides of the issues. (Even if the opposing views are ridiculous lies). They really can’t call themselves fair and balanced, if they don’t show both sides. CNN and the traditional Alphabets would still be decent sites if they would do that.
Of course, like almost every outlet, there’s waaay too much opinion, and not enough hard news, but they have to fill up those 24 hours some how.
Get lost, you gay anti Trump creep!
Boy, did we dodge a bullet THAT time!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.