Skip to comments.Hillary and Chelsea Clinton: ‘We cannot give in. That’s how they win’
Posted on 11/19/2019 8:47:01 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
If there is a prevailing message in Hillary and Chelsea Clintons The Book of Gutsy Women albeit perhaps not precisely the one they meant it is that making change for women and girls is painful, tough, and requires almost inhuman reserves of personal grit. The volume is a collection of mini-biographies of gutsy women, and its intended mood, I surmise, is upbeat and inspirational. The subjects range from the learned 17th-century Mexican nun Suor Juana de la Cruz to the bracingly named Cherokee politician Barbara Mankiller. But behind the celebratory gloss the real take-home, to use the requisite Ted Talk phrase, is this: toughen up. The fight is on.
My view, Hillary says, is that we are going to continue to progress there is too much energy behind that, and women are not going to easily surrender to the pressures they are now facing. But we have to be aware that it doesnt happen by accident. It happens because women and men continue to point out the unfairness and oppression and absurdity of trying to put women out of the public arena.
(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...
Give in to what? Those people are certifiable.
Lord Haw Haw said the same thing as he spouted propaganda for the Third Reich and Hitler lay dying.
Couple of Real Losers
Of course he was drunk during that broadcast and hanged after the war.
The Book Of Gusty Women
Hillary and Chelsea after their lunch of burritos.
No one gives a flying rip about either one of you two worthless examples of womanry.
So keep giving us money!
Please elaborate on how gutsy Chelsea has demonstrated personal grit in her rise to a position of wealth and privilege.
I swear that I need a new keyboard now!
Actually. how we won was campaigning in Michigan and Wisconsin, which your elderly mother was too drunk, sick. and arrogant to do.
These criminal grifters can’t “give in” to civility, honesty, integrity, morality, reason, truth and anything seem by most as “good”. They are the personification of criminal louts...the whole DNA-damaged family is malignant. They all should be in prison...or exiled for the rest of their malignant, worthless lives.
Who is putting women out of the public arena?
Does that make any sense?
Everyone was too passive about Chelsea. The saying goes “The Clinton Foundation is Chelsea’s piggy bank.” If allegations are true then what indictment was done? None.
Then she began tweeting her esteemed opinions. Bad news-—that meant she will be in public office soon. She and Katy Perry and that Greta person have confident opinions heard from a unicorn on a flying carpet.
People like her are like the Western movie or detective show gunsels or henchmen. The hero punches them and knocks them unconscious. Then later the hero has to drop his gun as the revived henchman comes in holding a gun on the innocent woman or the crusading town mayor.
Eliminate (here I mean legally, of course) the Clinton crime family gunsel Chelsea before her crimes are called a “conspiracy theory” and a “hoax” by the future Schiffs.
Hillary...... guess what? Y’all have already lost.
They are both hag nags. That is how they have obtained what they wanted. Not sure I would call it success. They will find out on judgment day.
They chose not to include Margaret Thatcher. What frauds the Clinton are.
You might as well title this book “Profiles in Female Courage,” since it’s just a cheap imitation of the book Pierre Salinger ghost-wrote for John Kennedy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.