To: SeekAndFind
No, now is the time for Trump to demand SPENDING CUTS!!!!!
5 posted on
11/18/2019 8:36:33 AM PST by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
To: MeganC
Tax cuts result in revenue increases so we need to do both spending cuts and tax cuts. All tax cuts are good.
6 posted on
11/18/2019 8:38:47 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: MeganC
Unfortunately Trump NEVER ran on spending cuts. He's not what anyone would ever consider a fiscal conservative.
Sure, it'd be so easy to lop off $100B without anyone missing anything, but he's in Washington now and they love our money. We love giving it to them too. Think I'm wrong? We keep voting for them, don't we?
11 posted on
11/18/2019 8:45:53 AM PST by
tenger
(Why only 435 representatives for 330 million people? Why did they stop raising the number in 1929?)
To: MeganC
“No, now is the time for Trump to demand SPENDING CUTS!!!!!”
Correct.
Downsize federal employment. Hit Democrats where it hurts.
Alas, we are at the pinnacle of gridlock. There will be no new laws until 2021 at the earliest.
13 posted on
11/18/2019 8:51:05 AM PST by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson