Skip to comments.Marie Yovanovitch’s Unchallenged False Testimony
Posted on 11/17/2019 4:43:45 AM PST by AJFavish
click here to read article
She committed two other acts of provable perjury. I forgot what they were, but convincing beyond a doubt. There were threads on them. One I think was not knowing about the Biden problem when she was instructed to not answer congressional questions about the situation. The Democrats told her to tell republicans to ask someone else about the issue before testifying.
So if she was coached not to talk about it, she had to know about it. She lied when she said she did not know at the time. I forgot the other situation, but just as provable.
This is from wiki but appears to be from a well documented meeting.
Except for Romney who is arse hole deep in the Ukraine corruption and pay for play.
“I have seen where he recanted.”
Do you have sources and knowledge that John Solomon and the New York Times does not have?
“He recanted, but did he do it under duress?”
Did y’all read the article?
He did not recant.
See post 19
Lutsenko recalled Yovanovitch insisted Kasko was an outstanding anti-corruption activist, and "the criminal case discredited those who were fighting against corruption." "I shared the details and explained that I could not open and close cases on my own. I listed some so-called anti-corruption activists under investigation. She said it was unacceptable, as it would undermine the credibility of anti-corruption activists. I took a piece of paper, put down the listed names and said: 'Give me a do not prosecute list.' She said: "No, you got me wrong.' I said: "No, I didn't get you wrong. Such lists were earlier drawn up on Bankova Street [the presidential administration's address, Lutsenko meant the Yanukovych administration], and now you give new lists on Tankova Street [the former name of Sikorsky Street, where the U.S. Embassy is located]. The meeting ended. I'm afraid the emotions were not very good," Lutsenko gave the details of his meeting with the ambassador.
That does not read like a denial to me. Only a clarification, that on this particular occasion, the ambassador said: "No, you got me wrong."
Threatened by a tweet she would not have known about until after the hearing unless shifhead told her?
Her testimony under democratic questioning was easy, clear and practiced. Under republican questioning she was confused, unclear, and often had to take a minute to organize her thoughts. All and all she seemed a nice lady. As the ambassador to a lawless oligarch ridden corrupt place trying to undo the corrupt mess, wild west type we need a bit different attitude. She complained about the reformer that was murdered with acid.
She is a school marm. I want a tough as nails ambassador that would give their government all assistance in finding the bad guys involved and drop a dime on them. If their government did not do anything, maybe arrange something with our alphabets. If the alphabets are incapable, maybe she could go out on a cool moonless night, and do it herself.
Don’t think that is the part she signed up for.
Of course if the crying was an act, and she did it already, she has my full support.
My first job, was a paper boy for the Evening Star & Sunday Tribune. 101 evening and 125 Sunday customers. I was 13.
I wish John Solomon would address this issue regarding her testimony.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.