To: MplsSteve
Speaking ill of the Holy father is a venal sin. If someone is a manifest public heretic, is it possible for that person also to be Pope? Does public persistence in heresy, and public proclamation of heresy, carry with it a penalty of excommunication laetae sententiae
Just curious ...
27 posted on
11/15/2019 11:55:03 AM PST by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: NorthMountain
Since the pope is basically the court of final appeal, there's no way he can be convicted, finally, under canon law. Since a pope can only be judged by another pope, I reckon that would mean:
- A past pope.That could only be B16 escaping his handlers, jumping over a wall with Ganswein, and finding his voice
- The present pope: Pope Francis could repent his sin, convict himself of heresy, and depose himself. That has actually happened: Marcellinus, regnal years 296-304.
- A future pope. This has historic precedent, too. I'd have to check my list, but I think this happened to PP Liberius, whose heresy was opposed by St. Athanasius; PP Zosimus (Pelagian); PP Vigilius; PP Boniface VI.
Let us pray.
61 posted on
11/15/2019 12:44:19 PM PST by
Mrs. Don-o
("Ambiguity is the mark of the demonic." +Josef Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) The Ratzinger Report, 1985)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson