NO.
What they need is a good ####ing beating that they never got.
Or a REAL hardship. At least ONE in their lifetime to let them know what IS important and what’s SICK NONSENSE.
Live and let live..until letting them be isn’t enough for them anymore and they EVERYONE to be a fruit or a TS, TG or whatever the ####.
I thought dems believed so much in evolution. Well then wouldn’t straight males ABSOLUTELY be revolted by males that CANT ensure the survival of the species?
Wouldn’t evolution dictate that something so threatening to the species be frowned upon highly?
But as with all things dem, something is only logical when it fits their needs.
“...But as with all things dem, something is only logical when it fits their needs....”
Boom.
That, right there. Spot on.
Seems to me that evolution dictates that the majority of the male population be heterosexual, not necessarily what the heterosexual male’s emotional response should be. Realistically if you have a large population and 1% is homosexual you don’t have to worry about running out of people. I don’t think even the libs buy their own lie that homosexuals are 10-20% of the population.