Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

You think???
1 posted on 11/14/2019 7:46:46 AM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Holy shit this guy ought to be a RINO, at least we’d get one more vote for caucusing...


54 posted on 11/14/2019 10:23:40 AM PST by StAnDeliver (CNN's Dana B: "Show of hands: Coverage for undocumented immigrants?" ***all Democrat hands raised***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

If you look it up in Fisch’s NY Evidence, the definition fits Taylor’s testimony like a glove, and doesn’t differ substantially from any 13th Century English case that discusses the term. It’s inadmissible in a court of law, and of questionable credibility in any context. So what.


57 posted on 11/14/2019 11:48:25 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel
“It’s really difficult dealing with this because it’s he said-she said.”

No it isn't! You just dealt with it!

It’s hearsay,” Van Drew said after Wednesday’s impeachment inquiry hearing. “It’s really difficult dealing with this because it’s he said-she said.”

Where is the difficulty?!

Does the difficulty come from being told to toe the Party impeachment line
when you know it's plainly BS and doing so could cost you your office if you do?

59 posted on 11/14/2019 11:50:56 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

61 posted on 11/14/2019 1:54:44 PM PST by headless_thompson_gunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Van Drew said he would need to see the stronger evidence such as verifiable documents or audio of President Trump’s conversations to prove the allegations levied against him for him to back impeachment.

There would also have to be some kind of crime. So far, the "impeachment" is purely about policy that DemocRATs did not approve.

63 posted on 11/16/2019 10:27:42 PM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Heard it from a friend who-oo-oo-oo, heard it from a friend who-oo-oo-oo-oo, heard it from another Trump’s been messing around.....


66 posted on 11/17/2019 10:12:02 PM PST by Impala64ssa (Virtue signalling is no virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson