“I know that Bruno Magli makes shoes that look like the shoes they had in court that’s involved with this case, I would have never worn those ugly ass shoes.” - OJ Simpson deposition at the civil trial.
Posted on 11/09/2019 9:36:14 AM PST by bgill
“I know that Bruno Magli makes shoes that look like the shoes they had in court that’s involved with this case, I would have never worn those ugly ass shoes.” - OJ Simpson deposition at the civil trial.
He needs cash and is fishing for a ‘settlement’.
First of all the confession of a serial killer who has nothing to lose is worth exactly nothing.
All the so exculpatory exculpatory evidence is what is known as evidence manufactured from nothing. False claims made over and over by evil people.
Such as the photo of OJ wearing the 'ugly-ass' shoes he denied owning in testimony during the criminal trial?
A month after the trial, serial killer provides details about the crime that were raised during the trial that was broadcast on TV.
Explain again how this is evidence of OJ's innocence?
So, he was banned from one casino. There are literally hundreds of other casinos in Las Vegas where he could go to gamble or have a meal.
It’s only that the Juice is a little short on funds to pay the Goldman restitution.
Is it even in the cosmic fabric of this universe, that this guy could possibly have his character torn down farther than he has already done it?
His fall from grace was a timeless lesson, and brought on by his own hands and actions.
Sorry OJ, I just hang my head at the thought of you.
You can’t be more of a public figure than OJ.
The Sullivan case makes it almost impossible for a public figure to win a defamation lawsuit.
oj simpson is not famous he is infamous..how could he prove defamation to his “reputation” lol...
OJ is innocent and Epstein did not kill himself.
What? No comments? C’mon, I have a LOT more, perhaps more than you think.
I am not an OJ lover, or a Goldman hater, I am a justice advocate. I don’t live by the word of the Main Stream Media, I study the evidence online, in books, I watch interviews.
Personally, IF OJ was covering for a friend, or a Family member, it was because he did not do it, and the evidence would prove him innocent. But I am not selecting who did this terrible thing, only following the evidence, nothing more.
That’s a broad statement, I am sure he is guilty of many things, just not this particular one. Anyone who is so closed minded as to believe that an opposing view, with lots of evidence to back it up, has something wrong with them, says more about him than anybody else IMO.
I respect your opinion, and am sorry you don’t respect mine. However, I have much that backs my opinion, do you?
He’s broke and needs money.
On the question of “How many customers of the limited edition 200-something pairs of size 12 Bruno Magli shoes were stomping through the blood scene?”, as I said previously, much was learned later on.
Concerning the issue of the shoe prints, it was later learned from Bruno Magli, that the sole was supplied by another company during construction of the shoe. This was later confirmed thru extended investigation By Norman Pardo.
“I’ve gone as far as to get his footprint on a piece of paper,” Pardo tells Radar. “What people don’t realize is that the size 12 Bruno Magli sole, that was supposedly used [by the murderer] was used on 19 different shoes, including work boots [like Rogers, a painter, would have worn]. I got the facts on that because I got the letter from Bruno Mali.”
So the point here, is that the sole pattern at the crime scene was used on 19 different shoes and shoe styles from different manufacturers, and the only thing consistent is that it was a size 12, which is common for men over 6 foot tall. This significantly increases the number of shoes that would use this sole, defeating the claim that only 200 shoes were made that year by Bruno Magli, while true, but certainly not all shoes manufactured with that sole pattern.
Again, even if you do not like the article, Bruno Magli was the source of the information, and was verified by both the prosecution and the defense , as well as the Police Investigators, and Fred Goldman, AFTER the trial had ended.
You left off the part that Nicole Brown Simpson also threatened OJs life. I did not ever say that OJ was a boy scout, they had marital strife, and had separated, both were seeing other people.
It is my OPINION that he was protecting his son, nothing more.
It would be unsubstantiated conjecture to say why that would be the case.
I was talking to BGill, not you. Sorry you took it that way.
I called Fred Goldman a parasite because he did not accept the decision by the court, and pursued a lesser conviction thru a civil court for punitive and monetary gain, based solely on a preponderance of the evidence.
He has pursued Simpson since relentlessly.
Sadly more than one person in the Goldman family died that day, Fred and his daughter have never moved on, or accepted what happened, and so have dedicated their lives to making OJ pay, which will never happen.
OJ Simpson just want them to leave him alone, and move on with their lives, and let him do the same.
So you agree that such behavior could lead to murder? Maybe Nicole did threaten his life but she didn't beat OJ and she's the one who is dead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.