Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoCal Pubbie; PIF

Many of our specialties designated as “combat” aren’t really battle focused, and many soldiers in such specialties would be with infantry units, technically, but in main battle areas (today’s rear). There are many paradoxes and contradictions in terminology. Today, from some of the terminology and schools (e.g., airborne), a woman can look like a rough, tough soldier, word wise. She can incur quite a bit of physical and psychological damage from social interactions, too.

Our military forces are a bloated, sick mess compared to what they could be under leaders like those of the early 1950s and before.


99 posted on 11/08/2019 2:22:16 PM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: familyop
That may be so, but the IDF has female ground pounders among their ranks, for better or worse.

https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2018/0208/Why-mixed-gender-combat-units-are-on-the-rise-in-Israel

This from a month ago!

https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Female-combat-soldiers-in-light-infantry-units-to-be-exempt-from-reserves-603959

77% of this combat battalion are female:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caracal_Battalion

I am NOT in favor of this but one simply can no longer use the IDF as an example of a military force of all male foot soldiers.

101 posted on 11/08/2019 2:29:35 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson