Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Rand Paul Corrects Reporter: It Is Not Illegal For Media To Name The Whistleblower
Real Clear Politics ^

Posted on 11/07/2019 10:25:57 AM PST by TigerClaws

Sen. Rand Paul Corrects Reporter: It Is Not Illegal For Media To Name The Whistleblower

Sen. Rand Paul told a reporter from "The Hill" Tuesday that it is absolutely not illegal for members of the media to reveal the name of the Ukraine phonecall whistleblower.

REPORTER: The whistleblower laws protect the whistleblower. You know it's illegal to out a whistleblower?

SEN. RAND PAUL: Actually, you see you've got that wrong too.

REPORTER: No, we don't.

RAND PAUL: You should work on the facts. The whistleblower statute protects the whistleblower from having his name revealed by the inspector general. Even The New York Times admits that no one else is under any legal obligation.

The other point, and you need to be really careful if you really are interested in the news, is the whistleblower actually is a material witness completely separate from being a whistleblower because he worked for Joe Biden at the same time Hunter Biden was receiving $50,000 per month. So the investigation into the corruption of Hunter Biden involves this whistleblower because he was there at the time.

Did he bring up the conflict of interest? Was there a discussion of this? What was his involvement with the relationship between Joe Biden and the prosecutor? There are a lot of questions the whistleblower has to answer.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cia; coup; ericciaramella; markzaid; shampeachment; suzannemalveauxcnn; trumpukraine; whistleblower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 11/07/2019 10:25:57 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

And when has that ever stopped them before?


2 posted on 11/07/2019 10:27:17 AM PST by rightwingcrazy (;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

amt 6 right to confront accuser?


3 posted on 11/07/2019 10:27:37 AM PST by conservativeimage (A Time For War?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
SLLAAAPPP!!!!
4 posted on 11/07/2019 10:32:02 AM PST by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Proof posted that Facebook is deleting all references to his name and all photos of Ciarmello.


5 posted on 11/07/2019 10:32:04 AM PST by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/hero-rand-paul-blocks-chuck-schumer-and-mazie-hironos-resolution-protecting-whistleblowers-and-anti-trump-scammers/

Hero Rand Paul Blocks Chuck Schumer and Mazie Hirono’s Resolution Protecting Whistleblowers and Anti-Trump Scammers


6 posted on 11/07/2019 10:32:33 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativeimage.com


It’s binding on the Intel Community ONLY.

And there is no protection from the Intel Community if anything is misrepresented. This Treasonous Hack misrepresented the charges on the form, so he has no protection whatsoever.

His only lawyer admits it’s a Coup.

Eric Ciaramella


7 posted on 11/07/2019 10:32:55 AM PST by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

I heard from a collar on rush today that the idiot chef put the guys name in the transcript release to the public and then quickly tried to walk that back


8 posted on 11/07/2019 10:33:58 AM PST by Truthoverpower (The guvmint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Go Rand Paul!


9 posted on 11/07/2019 10:39:19 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

https://www.dailywire.com/news/rand-paul-reveals-what-he-may-do-with-ukraine-whistleblower/

CNN reporter Suzanne Malveaux, apparently upset over the fact that Paul wanted transparency in Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, aggressively confronted Paul over the issue.

“The whistleblower laws they protect the whistleblower,” Malveaux said. “You know it’s illegal to out a whistleblower?”

Paul immediately corrected her, saying, “Actually, you see you’ve got that wrong.”

“No, we don’t,” Malveaux falsely claimed as she became agitated.

Paul then proceeded to educate Malveaux on the laws surrounding the whistleblower.

//

Suzanne Malveaux
@SuzanneMalveaux

Mom, CNN National Correspondent & Anchor, Covered White House 10 years, Marathoner & Triathlete, as a kid aspired to be a Soul Train dancer.


10 posted on 11/07/2019 10:40:35 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Rand is fighting! Excellent!


11 posted on 11/07/2019 10:41:24 AM PST by Chgogal (Never underestimate the stupidity of a DummycRAT voter! Proof: California, New York, Illinois....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I would bet money that the Reporter walked away from this exchange thinking, “I am smarter than the Senator because I know it is illegal for media to name the whistleblower, and the Senator just can’t grasp this.”


12 posted on 11/07/2019 10:41:43 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
...the whistleblower actually is a material witness completely separate from being a whistleblower because he worked for Joe Biden at the same time Hunter Biden was receiving $50,000 per month. So the investigation into the corruption of Hunter Biden involves this whistleblower because he was there at the time. Did he bring up the conflict of interest? Was there a discussion of this?

Wow! Fantastic. School those fake "journalist" bastards who refuse to acknowledge the truth of what's really going on here.

13 posted on 11/07/2019 10:42:20 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The big question is whether “The Hill” will run with the story the reporter submits. Or will it be extensively “edited” to make Trump look bad and Biden look good?


14 posted on 11/07/2019 10:44:01 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Suzanne Malveaux ... just one more “journalist” who would be cleaning Hillary’s bedpans for a living if CNN didn’t exist.


15 posted on 11/07/2019 10:45:11 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Imagine if the press performed in a manner similar to “investigating” Watergate. One reason it probably wouldn’t happen, outside of political bent, is that the bodies of the media would start showing up dead in parks and forested areas near where they work and live.


16 posted on 11/07/2019 10:45:29 AM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

With one or two honorable exceptions, most Hill writers are leftists b.s. propagandists for the MARXIST Democratic machine.


17 posted on 11/07/2019 10:45:45 AM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Figures)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Oops!

Lars Larson just said “Eric Ciarmello” on the air (Fox) Outnumbered Overtime.

CBS fires the alleged Epstein video leak for leaking something... at ABC! Happened earlier today.

Where are the press standing up for whistleblowers?


18 posted on 11/07/2019 10:47:11 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
[ RAND PAUL: You should work on the facts. ]

Good job on this one, Rand. Of course, they don't want facts, mind you. They are dependent upon LIES. LOTS OF LIES. CONSTANT LIES. MULTIPLE LIES. /caps lock

Because LIES work VERY WELL on Democrat voters. /oops there goes that caps lock again - darn thing


19 posted on 11/07/2019 10:47:17 AM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Sounds like Rand Paul made this dame choke on her spoon-fed libtard talking points. Good on him, glad somebody’s not taking it.


20 posted on 11/07/2019 10:48:37 AM PST by truthkeeper (All Trump Has Going for Him is the Votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson