Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oklahoma Supreme Court temporarily blocks law banning common abortion procedure
The Hill ^ | Nov 4, 2019 | Jessie Hellmann

Posted on 11/04/2019 9:08:00 PM PST by Morgana

The Oklahoma Supreme Court on Monday temporarily blocked the state from enforcing a ban on a common abortion procedure.

In a 6-2 decision, the court ruled that Oklahoma could not enforce a ban on dilation and evacuation abortions, the most common method used in second trimester pregnancies.

The preliminary injunction will remain in effect while the Supreme Court decides whether the ban is lawful.

The Center for Reproductive Rights asked the court to block the ban from taking effect after an Oklahoma state trial court upheld it earlier this year.

“Today’s decision means Oklahomans can continue receiving high-quality, evidence-based abortion care,” said Autumn Katz, senior counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights.

The law was passed in 2015, but has never gone into effect because of legal challenges.

Under the law, doctors who perform dilation and evacuation abortions could face up to two years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: abortion; oklahoma; prolife

1 posted on 11/04/2019 9:08:00 PM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Hmmm, which Amendment covers this ‘right’?


2 posted on 11/04/2019 9:16:35 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Pledge: "...and to the Democracy for which it stands..." I give up. Use the democRat meme...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Democrat judges are wicked.


3 posted on 11/04/2019 9:17:46 PM PST by ALASKA (Watching an attempted coup by a thousand cuts....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
“Today’s decision means Oklahomans can continue receiving high-quality, evidence-based abortion care,” said Autumn Katz

So now they are calling murder "high quality."

God will be judging you, Autumn.

4 posted on 11/05/2019 6:57:51 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
high-quality, evidence-based abortion care

Calling abortion "care" does not make it a caring act. In addition, using language typically reserved for the medical profession does not make it a medical procedure.

Call abortion what it is: the intentional brutal murder of an innocent child for the purpose of profit. Only judges who understand that should be ruling on abortion law.

5 posted on 11/05/2019 7:00:51 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

So how did OK, one of the reddest states in the union, end up with a pro abort SC?


6 posted on 11/05/2019 7:07:36 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Oklahoma has a commission system. Qualified nominees must submit their names to the Oklahoma Judicial Nominating Commission to verify that they will serve if appointed. In the event of a vacancy on the court, after reviewing potential justices, the commission must submit three names to the governor, of whom the governor appoints one to the Supreme Court to serve until the next general state election.

Four of the current eight justices on the court were appointed by Democrat Brad Henry (there is one current vacancy).

George Nigh (D), Mary Fallin (R), Frank Keating (R) and Kevin Stitt (R) each appointed one.

So 5 out of the current 8 were appointed by Democrats.


7 posted on 11/05/2019 7:59:41 AM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

It’s death by dismemberment.


8 posted on 11/05/2019 5:04:17 PM PST by DrGunsforHands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DrGunsforHands; unixfox; All

>It’s death by dismemberment.

You know, you bring up a good point &, IMO, a venue to abolish (presuming it hasn’t already been tried):

Cruel & unusual ‘punishment’

Could you imagine the Leftists head exploding would they attempt to rationalize how an abortion is ‘humane’ vs. criminal executions via the same process??


9 posted on 11/06/2019 5:07:15 AM PST by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson