Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whistleblower’s Attorney Threatens Legal Action
OANN ^

Posted on 11/02/2019 5:12:25 PM PDT by janetjanet998

AN Newsroom UPDATED 3:25 PM PT — Saturday, November 2, 2019 The whistleblower’s legal team is saying it won’t hesitate to take legal action against media outlets that identify him. Speaking to the Daily Caller, the whistleblower’s attorneys said any organization that reports his name will be personally liable if that person is physically harmed.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 20190725; accuser; andrewbakaj; anonymity; bakaj; charlie; ciaramella; coup; democrats; ericciaramella; indictthem; markzaid; mccullough; rumorblower; secrecy; seditionists; spies; tds; treason; tye; whistlebloweraid; whoscharlie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: Cyclops08
I smell eau d'Pajama Boy Whistleleaker
61 posted on 11/02/2019 6:10:22 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (waiting for the tweets to hatch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

lol..what right does he have to make a false accusation against the President of the United States (that started an impeachment inquiry) and expect to be anonymous? this witness/leaker/rat has no expectation of privacy imo. He should be having to answer for his alleged false statement on his verified complaint that he did not contact congress before the IG


62 posted on 11/02/2019 6:14:37 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no justice no peace and leakers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Better get a better lawyer turncoat .... not a chance.


63 posted on 11/02/2019 6:15:59 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shanover

The only danger to the Soy Boy is the 500lbs anvil dropping on his head from the top of the cliff by the Roadrunner. Can you say “backfire”?


64 posted on 11/02/2019 6:18:21 PM PDT by Kahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Someone who makes up and erroneously reports 2nd hand information is not a whistleblower.


65 posted on 11/02/2019 6:21:37 PM PDT by freedom1st (Build the Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

66 posted on 11/02/2019 6:22:13 PM PDT by Captain Compassion (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

"Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella Eric Ciaramella"


Eric Ciaramella (pronounced "Charlie-the-mole").

67 posted on 11/02/2019 6:27:24 PM PDT by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Songcraft

He will have to testify. At this point in time there are only two probable pieces of evidence. The Whistleblower report and the transcript of the call. Oh yes he will have to testify.


68 posted on 11/02/2019 6:32:47 PM PDT by Captain Compassion (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff35

I think I've got it -- you're referring there to one of those big fancy cameras with a "Super-Telephoto-Lens", aren't you?




69 posted on 11/02/2019 6:33:58 PM PDT by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Captain Compassion

Can't wait to see it, if/when it comes to that (either in a congressional hearing, or in a court of law).

70 posted on 11/02/2019 6:39:24 PM PDT by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Eric Ciaramella has nothing to worry about. We have families and responsibilities and we do not act like you leftist liberals, so you are safe A-HOLE.


71 posted on 11/02/2019 6:51:03 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
Everybody in his brother knows who this guy is already.

Multiple media outlets (but not the MSM however) have released his name and partisan background.

Which media outlet is the attorney going after if there is a bunch of them?

This so-called WB, actually Leaker is more descriptive, shouldn't be in the kitchen if he can't stand the heat.

72 posted on 11/02/2019 7:03:17 PM PDT by HotHunt (Been there. Done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

As if. Just lawyer woofing.


73 posted on 11/02/2019 7:10:21 PM PDT by gogeo (The left prides themselves on being tolerant, but they can't even be civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Bears repeating:

The White House “whistleblower” is Eric Ciaramella. - Registered Democrat - Worked for Obama - Worked with Joe Biden - Worked for CIA Director John Brennan - Vocal critic of Trump - Helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation hoax


74 posted on 11/02/2019 7:16:49 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Epstein proves it's all a charade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

Alexa, who is Eric Ciaramella ?


75 posted on 11/02/2019 7:19:02 PM PDT by Mark (Celebrities... is there anything they do not know? -Homer Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mark

google who is the whistleblower?


76 posted on 11/02/2019 7:20:05 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no justice no peace and leakers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

He has no right to anonymity under the First Amendment or common law. He’s out of control.


77 posted on 11/02/2019 7:20:14 PM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

The whistleblower’s legal team noted that there’s no law banning media outlets from identifying whistleblowers. They instead said the decision comes down to “ethics and professionalism.”

msm ethics? professional? roflmao maybe the lawyers should be shamed for threatening fake legal action...


78 posted on 11/02/2019 7:23:12 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no justice no peace and leakers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Trumpisourlastchance

Snitches do not merit protection of any kind.


79 posted on 11/02/2019 7:26:59 PM PDT by miserare ( Indict Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: miserare
jailhouse saying-snitches get stitches
80 posted on 11/02/2019 7:32:37 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no justice no peace and leakers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson