Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton admits she played a role in RBG's selection for Supreme Court
CNN ^ | 10/30/19 | Ariane de Vogue

Posted on 10/31/2019 1:53:41 AM PDT by Libloather

Washington (CNN) — Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, sitting next to her husband, former President Bill Clinton, admitted Wednesday night that she had played a pivotal role in his decision to name Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Supreme Court in 1993.

"I knew that of all the people who were part of the women's movement she was one of the key players because of her creative understanding of the law and her sense of commitment," said Hillary Clinton, who's a lawyer herself. She added, "I may have expressed an opinion or two about the people he should bring to the top of the list."

The comments came as the Clintons joined Ginsburg on stage for an event at Georgetown Law. The couple talked about Ginsburg's legal acumen and her path marking success as a young lawyer in the area of gender discrimination. But they also confessed that both of them have attempted the 86-year-old justice's famed workout regime with varied success.

(Excerpt) Read more at -m.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; court; ginsburg; hillary; supreme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
"It was a real struggle," the former president said, before reminiscing about his conversation with Ginsburg more than 25 years ago when he sneaked her into the White House to interview her for the top court in the land.

Ruth Buzzy brought her own kneepads? Say it ain't so.

1 posted on 10/31/2019 1:53:41 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Don’t paint no pictures.


2 posted on 10/31/2019 1:54:48 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Bipolars have more fun. No we don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Creative understanding of the law?

You mean make stuff up!


3 posted on 10/31/2019 1:57:53 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Will she say who the successor is?


4 posted on 10/31/2019 2:24:35 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
”her creative understanding of the law”

Legislating from the bench.

Democrat judges legislate, and Republican judges apply the existing law. This causes the law to drift left.

5 posted on 10/31/2019 2:34:33 AM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Trump is solving the worldÂ’s problems only to distract us from Russia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

cankles desperately seeking validation


6 posted on 10/31/2019 2:35:45 AM PDT by 867V309 (who's yo Baghdadi?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

“admitted Wednesday night that she had played a pivotal role in his decision to name Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Supreme Court in 1993”

I wouldn’t put it past her - but she’s probably lying.


7 posted on 10/31/2019 2:37:54 AM PDT by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

You forgot the “BARF” alert.

Altho, I realize it’s pretty obvious from the title. :)


8 posted on 10/31/2019 2:53:07 AM PDT by blondiegoodbadugly (Thank you President Trump! Please continue MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

“Democrat judges legislate, and Republican judges apply the existing law.”

Perhaps until pwned Chief “Justice” Roberts.


9 posted on 10/31/2019 3:20:54 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
...because of her creative understanding of the law...

In other words she makes it up as she goes along.

10 posted on 10/31/2019 3:23:11 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

She is laying claim to everything, trying to create a legacy no one even cares about.


11 posted on 10/31/2019 3:31:35 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

BS....Ginsburg replaced a woman. Ginsburg didn’t exactly need Clinton for anything. BUT, we have to remember that th only reason Bubba won was because of the women’s vote.


12 posted on 10/31/2019 3:45:20 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Hillary Clinton also ramrodded Juddering Janet Reno into the AG’s post with shocking and disastrous results for all, not just the poor souls in Waco.

Her recruitment and selection of underlings and advisors has been spectacularly poor. One can only imagine what her cabinet would have looked like.


13 posted on 10/31/2019 4:04:40 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Great. A law ethics violator (see Nixon case), Hillary Clinton, had a pivotal role in getting one of the worst Supreme Court Justices picked and nominated.

That explains a lot and none of it good.


14 posted on 10/31/2019 4:18:04 AM PDT by Boomer (Our melting pot has turned into a pressure cooker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Yes, the woman vote that looked the other way when it came to how he abused women.


15 posted on 10/31/2019 4:25:46 AM PDT by fuente (Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

No because of mr. “here’s what ya don’t lahk”
Splitting the vote


16 posted on 10/31/2019 4:35:58 AM PDT by Phil DiBasquette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Hmmmm. Maybe it was a quid pro quo with Bill. Maybe she allowed him to date other women, if he nominated RBG. 😁😆🤗👍
17 posted on 10/31/2019 4:50:49 AM PDT by Mark17 (Once saved, always saved. I do not care if some do not like that. It will NEVER be my problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

As if we need another reason to despise this deranged, power hungry, tyrannical, mentally dessicated old washed up alcoholic hag.


18 posted on 10/31/2019 4:59:41 AM PDT by rlmorel (Trump to China: This Capitalist Will Not Sell You the Rope with Which You Will Hang Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Hmmm,
That FLOTUS’ insert themselves into the political process is assuredly not constitutional.


19 posted on 10/31/2019 5:10:01 AM PDT by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

She played a role in Trump getting to name RPG’s replacement because RPG thought for sure the she-devil would would win the 2016 election and therefore felt no urgency to retire at an earlier age.


20 posted on 10/31/2019 5:14:38 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson