Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Out-Of-Control Pelosi/Schiff Ban Republicans Frm Viewing Transcripts of ‘Secret’Impeachment Hearings
Rightwingtribune.com ^ | Dean James October 22, 2019

Posted on 10/22/2019 2:42:38 PM PDT by Red Badger

Republicans have allegedly been barred from even viewing transcripts taken during impeachment hearings. This includes the transcripts of Executive Branch employees who, it has been reported, have provided largely exculpatory testimony.

Testimony, that because of Pelosi’s rules, we’ll never see. Neither will House Republicans or President Trump’s attorneys.

Schiff/Pelosi-led Democrats will craft the narrative and the limited ‘factual’ evidence that becomes public in a carefully managed scheme to shape public opinion.

Does this sound familiar? It should:

“The truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the state.”

This is the latest attempt to silence the defense of President Trump while Democrats rely on the echo chamber of their media allies to present cherry-picked passages to move public opinion to support their illicit scam.

Here’s one example of how the narrative is being crafted and supported by the equally corrupt mainstream media:

Swamp guardian Chris Wallace presented this limited text message exchange as evidence of a quid pro quo:

Here’s what wasn’t shown and that Pelosi ignored in cherry-picked fact sheet she released yesterday:

Pelosi’s rules prevent Republicans from asking questions that may have inconvenient answers during the hearings lest the media have something positive to report in the president’s defense.

Republicans are not permitted to call defense witnesses of their own.

Democrats are so paranoid about keeping a lid on the proceedings that at least some of the hearings are said to have been conducted in a SCIF that has been, up until now, reserved for holding top secret discussions or for reviewing highly-classified evidence.

This ain’t that.

Americans who are watching these latter-day Democrats should ask themselves if they can do this to a president, what chance they would have against these authoritarians?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: M Kehoe
Doesn’t this behavior of Pelosi and Schiff for brains remind you of the Soviet Union?

I was going to say why did we learn about how bad Stalin and Kruschev were and how they could have an opponent grabbed and held in a room for secret KGB questioning without a lawyer and all that. Communism. Now it's Pelosyism and Schiffism.

For this we learned to duck and cover under our school desks in the 1950s?

We have to fight for freedom again.

41 posted on 10/22/2019 3:59:09 PM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud & harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: frnewsjunkie

Great, great post. I wouldn’t change a word.

The fact that people just let this go on and believe the media is disheartening as you say. Secret KGB style testimony withheld from the accused party (Trump).

With leaks to trick him into saying something incriminating or believing an insider has turned on him. Like separating defendants who are each told the other is getting off for turning the first one in.


42 posted on 10/22/2019 4:07:11 PM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud & harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Correct, sort of.

They know they can’t remove him honestly.

This is to stir shit up and make the claim that “President Trump is simply retaliating *blah, blah blah” once the report finally hits.

At least, that’s my impression. According to possibly a majority of posters here, the Barr/Durham angle is a pointless sideshow to placate the right that will result in nothing anyways.


43 posted on 10/22/2019 4:08:00 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

so the President has No Rights in all of this , what country was this created for ?


44 posted on 10/22/2019 4:11:59 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

My understanding is that it has something to do with Pelosi refusing to call an actual vote to begin the process, which the rules regarding questioning etc. would have to be agreed-upon by both parties. By not doing that Pelosi and the Democrats can basically do what they want by making their own rules.


45 posted on 10/22/2019 4:20:55 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

re: “As long as it’s not and ‘official’ impeachment inquiry, and it isn’t, they just say it is, they can exclude Republicans as long as they want.”

And STILL ‘subpoena’ executive branch employees?

As another poster put it, horsesh!t.


46 posted on 10/22/2019 4:41:50 PM PDT by _Jim (Save babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; Jane Long; MinuteGal; jsanders2001; V K Lee; HarleyLady27; stephenjohnbanker; ...

CONTACT: The Associated Press headquarters
212.621.1500 or email info@ap.org for general inquiries.

Contact CBS New York
https://newyork.cbslocal.com › contact-us
SWITCHBOARD: 212-975-4321.
NEWSLINE: 800-CH-2-NEWS (800-242-6397) FAX: 212-975-9387.
(Note: Story ideas should be faxed to the attention of “Assignment Desk.”)
ASSIGNMENT DESK: 212-975-5867, desk@cbs2ny.com.
STATION SERVICES: stationservices@cbs2ny.com.
CBS2’s DIGITAL EDITORIAL STAFF: 212-975-7675
CBS Press Express
https://www.cbspressexpress.com

CBS NEWS Christa Robinson. Senior Vice President, Communications. 212-975-2888. robinsonc@cbsnews.com.
Lance Frank. Vice President, Communications. 212-975-2888
ContactCBS Interactive
https://www.cbsinteractive.com › contact
Contact BS Audience Network, CBS All Access, CBS News. cbssales@cbsinteractive
CBSI-Programmatic@cbsinteractive.com ...

FAIR’s Media Contact List
https://fair.org › take-action-now › media-contact-list
FAIR’s Media Contact List 1-212-456-7777 / 1-212-456-7700.
Email forms for ABC news programs ...
Email forms for all CBS news programs @CBSNews.

https://newyork.cbslocal.com › contact-us
Contact Us. SWITCHBOARD: 212-975-4321. NEWSLINE: 800-CH-2-NEWS (800-242-6397) FAX: 212-975-9387. (Note: Story ideas should be faxed to the attention of “Assignment Desk.” ASSIGNMENT DESK: 212-975-5867, desk@cbs2ny.com. STATION SERVICES: stationservices@cbs2ny.com. CBS2’s DIGITAL EDITORIAL STAFF: 212-975-7675, by email ...
CBS Headquarters Information – Headquarters Info
www.headquartersinfo.com › Television
CBS is a telecommunications business responsible for CBS News and the CBS ... Email: You can contact CBS headquarters by email via the investor relations ...
Contacts - CBS Press Express
https://www.cbspressexpress.com › cbs-news › contacts
Christa Robinson. Senior Vice President, Communications. 212-975-2888. robinsonc@cbsnews.com. Lance Frank. Vice President, Communications. 212-975- ...
CBS News: Contact Information, Journalists, and Overview ...
https://muckrack.com › media-outlet › cbsnews
Use Muck Rack to learn more about CBS News and connect with journalists at CBS News.

Contact CBS Interactive
https://www.cbsinteractive.com › contact
Contact CBS.com, CBS Audience Network, CBS All Access, CBS News. cbssales@cbsinteractive. ... Advertising. CBSI-Programmatic@cbsinteractive.com ...


ABC-NEWS
ABC News, 47 West 66th Street,
New York, NY 10023.(212) 456-2400
You can reach ABC-NEWS via email at news.tips@abc.com or by phone at (212) 456-2400
NOTE the information you provide might be used in our broadcasts or other stories.

Contact ABC News
https://abcnews.go.com › Site › page › contact-abcnewscom-3068843
Please use the links below to direct your e-mail to the various ABC News broadcasts and to ABCNews.com on the Web.


NBS NEWS STAFF
Catherine Kim / Executive.Editor@nbcuni.com
Managing Editor David Firestone / Managing.Editor@nbcuni.com
Assistant Managing Editor for News Tim Perone / Tim.Perone@nbcuni.com

Television contacts:
NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt: nightly@nbcuni.com
Meet the Press: contact.mtp@nbcuni.com
Today: TodayStories@nbcuni.com

Digital Editors:
Senior Tech Editor, Jason Abbruzzese / Jason.Abbruzzese@nbcuni.com

Senior THINK Editor, Meredith Bennett-Smith / think@nbcuni.com

Senior Politics Editor, Gregg Birnbaum / Gregg.Birnbaum@nbcuni.com

Senior Editor, News Projects, Anna Brand / Anna.Brand@nbcuni.com

Senior News Editor, London, Brinley Bruton / Brinley.Bruton@nbcuni.com

THINK Editor, Megan Carpentier / think@nbcuni.com

Copy Editor, Dipti Coorg / Dipti.Coorg@nbcuni.com

News Editor, Los Angeles, Amanda Covarrubius / Amanda.Covarrubius@nbcuni.com

Breaking News Editor, Maia Davis / Maia.Davis@nbcuni.com

Bureau Manager, Los Angeles, Richie Duchon / Richie.Duchon@nbcuni.com

Catherine Kim / Executive.Editor@nbcuni.com
Managing Editor
David Firestone / Managing.Editor@nbcuni.com
Assistant Managing Editor for News
Tim Perone / Tim.Perone@nbcuni.com

Television contacts:
NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt: nightly@nbcuni.com
Meet the Press: contact.mtp@nbcuni.com
Today: TodayStories@nbcuni.com
Dateline NBC: dateline.contactus@nbcuni.com
MSNBC: MSNBCTVinfo@nbcuni.com
The Rachel Maddow Show: rachel@nbcuni.com
NBC News Media Relations: nbcnewsmediarelations@nbcuni.com


TALKING POINTS
Out-Of-Control Pelosi/Schiff Ban Republicans Frm Viewing Transcripts of ‘Secret’Impeachment Hearings
Rightwingtribune.com ^ | Dean James October 22, 2019
FR Posted on 10/22/2019, 5:42:38 PM by Red Badger

Republicans have allegedly been barred from even viewing transcripts taken during impeachment hearings. This includes the transcripts of Executive Branch employees who, it has been reported, have provided largely exculpatory testimony.
Testimony, that because of Pelosi’s rules, we’ll never see. Neither will House Republicans or President Trump’s attorneys. Schiff/Pelosi-led Democrats will craft the narrative and the limited ‘factual’ evidence that becomes public in a carefully managed scheme to shape public opinion.

Does this sound familiar? It should: “The truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the state.” This is the latest attempt to silence the defense of President Trump while Democrats rely on the echo chamber of their media allies to present cherry-picked passages to move public opinion to support their illicit scam.

Here’s one example of how the narrative is being crafted and supported by the equally corrupt mainstream media:
Swamp guardian Chris Wallace presented this limited text message exchange as evidence of a quid pro quo:

Here’s what wasn’t shown and that Pelosi ignored in cherry-picked fact sheet she released yesterday:
Pelosi’s rules prevent Republicans from asking questions that may have inconvenient answers during the hearings lest the media have something positive to report in the president’s defense. Republicans are not permitted to call defense witnesses of their own.

Democrats are so paranoid about keeping a lid on the proceedings that at least some of the hearings are said to have been conducted in a SCIF that has been, up until now, reserved for holding top secret discussions or for reviewing highly-classified evidence. This ain’t that. Americans who are watching these latter-day Democrats should ask themselves if they can do this to a president, what chance they would have against these authoritarians?


47 posted on 10/22/2019 4:57:10 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Should the Senate vote to convict, that will be the line crossed. For me.


48 posted on 10/22/2019 5:01:45 PM PDT by gogeo (The left prides themselves on being tolerant, but they can't even be civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
I think Republicans like being in the majority so they can send out fundraising letters telling people how scary the Democrats are and how much we “need” Republicans in office to make things right. The problem is they don’t want to do any of the things they promise.

Unfortunately, no one is buying it anymore.

49 posted on 10/22/2019 5:03:38 PM PDT by gogeo (The left prides themselves on being tolerant, but they can't even be civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Jim Robinson

JIM, can liz’s list of media contact information be placed under activism so it can be easily accessible? If I remember correctly we once had such a resource.


50 posted on 10/22/2019 5:04:47 PM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

is this legal?


51 posted on 10/22/2019 5:41:49 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I Love BULL MARKETS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Liz

“This ain’t that. Americans who are watching these latter-day Democrats should ask themselves if they can do this to a president, what chance they would have against these authoritarians?”

At what point do we warn ‘our betters’ that this will not stand. Tree of Liberty...

Time for us to hit the local paper editorials to inform the public concerning this Kangaroo Kourt. Time to tweet, and renounce these proceedings on other platforms.

If we won’t do it, who will? This truly is a fight for The Soul of America.


52 posted on 10/22/2019 5:47:16 PM PDT by WWG1WWA ("Brothers, what we do in life echoes in eternity." - Marcus Aurelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Liz

/


53 posted on 10/22/2019 6:05:58 PM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is Mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

It’s a lynching. Totally unjust. Intentionally unjust.


54 posted on 10/22/2019 6:07:47 PM PDT by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA

Amen.


55 posted on 10/22/2019 6:08:18 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA

...or

What will they do to us?


56 posted on 10/22/2019 6:08:30 PM PDT by combat_boots (TGod bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! Merry Christmas! In God We Trust! Hi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

They could do that but would have to pretend to really be Antifa, then the doors would be open for them or perhaps they could copy the gang that was banging on the SC doors at the Kavanaugh hearings


57 posted on 10/22/2019 6:12:37 PM PDT by dandiegirl (BOBBY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

In a just political universe, McConnell would phone Schumer and tell him to tell pelosi that if democrats persist in marginalizing Republican participation, the senate would do likewise. None of the evidence gathered would be shared with democrat senators. Without evidence, there will be nothing to do but vote.


58 posted on 10/22/2019 6:14:38 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

In a just political universe, McConnell would phone Schumer and tell him to tell pelosi that if democrats persist in marginalizing Republican participation, the senate would do likewise. None of the evidence gathered would be shared with democrat senators. Without evidence, there will be nothing to do but vote.


59 posted on 10/22/2019 6:15:24 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

In a just political universe, McConnell would phone Schumer and tell him to tell pelosi that if democrats persist in marginalizing Republican participation, the senate would do likewise. None of the evidence gathered would be shared with democrat senators. Without evidence, there will be nothing to do but vote.


60 posted on 10/22/2019 6:21:17 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson