If a convicted felon is stated to be the “peer” of the person on trial, are they then not saying that person is also a felon?
If it is a death penalty case, then they will have to dig up the jurors.
Well, not so much anymore in CA, but that’s where that ‘logic’ leads.
I have the same question.
A peer would be non-felon in the eyes of a just law, that whole "presumed innocent" thingie.
I'm so glad that I moved from suicidal, once-golden state.
I do worry about my friends and fam there and the many good Californians who do not deserve the malignant self-destruction that appears to be in a power dive.