"they couldn’t knock down the portion on Galloway's property because he wouldn’t let them on his land."
Hmmm sounds like he was trying to stiff taxpayers.
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
You don’t own property, do you?
2 posted on
10/19/2019 6:14:33 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Stiff the taxpayers!!!! LOL. That what the city does every day to the taxpayers.😃😃😃
4 posted on
10/19/2019 6:15:55 PM PDT by
Kozy
(new age haruspex; "Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth.")
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
City didn’t lose a building, they just need to build a new end wall.
On the other hand the property owner has a new end wall and just needs to build the rest of the building.
This situation just needs fresh eyes..............................
5 posted on
10/19/2019 6:19:58 PM PDT by
PeterPrinciple
(Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
He will now be appraised for a Improved Structure on his property.
Moral of the story?
Good fences make good neighbors.
6 posted on
10/19/2019 6:20:30 PM PDT by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's fore sure)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Go ahead and build on city property and see what happens.
7 posted on
10/19/2019 6:20:43 PM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with islamic terrorists - they want to die for allah and we want to kill them.)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget; Gamecock; SaveFerris; PROCON
NEWMAN: ...But I have made a decision. We will cut the building down the middle, and give half to each of you.
ELAINE: (shout) What?! This is your solution?! To ruin the building?!
ELAINE: Alright, fine. Fine. Go ahead. (standing) Cut the stupid thing in half.
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Next thing they will nail him for is constructing a building too close to a property line and building a fence without a permit and begin issuing fines of hundreds of dollars a day.
13 posted on
10/19/2019 6:30:07 PM PDT by
Clay Moore
(“Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities” Voltaire.)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Sounds like he was enforcing his property rights against adverse possession by the local government to me.
L
14 posted on
10/19/2019 6:30:14 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
Seems logical to me. kind of like when a tree branch is hanging on your property
16 posted on
10/19/2019 6:44:25 PM PDT by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
It’s called a “cut and face”. Not terribly unusual in encroachment cases.
20 posted on
10/19/2019 7:42:38 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Reminds me of my stint as a poll watcher for Ronald Reagan in 1980. Man and wife, living at same address, come to vote. Wife gets to vote; but man is not in that district. He can’t vote until he finds his district and vote there.
Fortunately, there were two polling districts in the same building. He had to vote in the second polling place. Somehow, the district line went right through his house.
21 posted on
10/19/2019 8:03:58 PM PDT by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
To: ADemocratNoMore; Akron Al; arbee4bush; agrace; ATOMIC_PUNK; Badeye; big bad easter bunny; ...
OHIO PING!
Please let me know if you want on or off the Ohio Ping list.
“‘Most ridiculous thing ever’: Officials split building in two to solve property dispute
WTTV ^ | October 19, 2019 | Tribune Media Wire “
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson