He is or he isn't.
The end.
If he’s so sure it’s not him he should have done a DNA test immediately. The prick is guilty as hell.
he might be the father but still innocent under any number of scenarios, one of the more straightforward being that they had intercourse using a condom, and she surreptitiously saved and impregnated herself with the contents of the used condom. if this happened in dc the most likely way that hunter was portraying himself to her was as a beltway mover and shaker. that would give her motivation to have a baby with him by any means necessary.
i am not saying it happened that way, but that it does not seem impossible that it could have happened that way, or in numerous other variations of that way.
having said that, is surreptitious impregnation sufficient grounds to determine parentage and child support responsibility? (1) morally and (2) legally. and (3) how many other guys could in theory be in hunter’s legal position if surreptitious impregnation were the case? also, can a court demand dna for an arbitrary baby? i recall an arkansas mother who alleged that WJC was the father of her baby a few years ago, and she was having a very difficult time obtaining WJC’s DNA...
Yes, a simple DNA match settles this one way or the other and they’re pretty damn quick these days, too.
If she’s demanding a DNA, he’s almost a sure bet to be the father.
She could be a player, but otherwise he’s in deep > IMO.