Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

TRANSLATION: "There doesn't even need to be a crime. Just the fact that we hate him so much is sufficient."
1 posted on 10/13/2019 9:57:44 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

When are they going to start talking about Schiff’s 16 visits to the Meth Guy Buck in LA?


2 posted on 10/13/2019 9:59:44 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is a joke and i hope it continues till after the election
What a gift for President Trump


3 posted on 10/13/2019 10:01:12 AM PDT by italianquaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Billy-Mmuy

4 posted on 10/13/2019 10:02:24 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The crime here is that VP Biden was President Obama’s point man on the Ukraine and he used his power of office to enrich himself and his family. Same as he did in China and evidence is gathering that there are other cases as well.


6 posted on 10/13/2019 10:04:47 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

WE as a people have come a long way since the Spanish Inquisition, huh?

Face your accusers, a right? HAAA!!!!

For Dems , it is now a privilege, and in this case.. Ironically, white man privilege in the form of Schifty setting any rules or standards he so chooses to set.

The American gubamint has crushed&torched many of its own citizens in the name of justice and public safety and far less, why not the President for just doing his job?


7 posted on 10/13/2019 10:05:18 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Schiff: There doesn’t need to be quid pro quo or quo pro quid. There doesn’t need to be pro quo squid or pro quo anything. There is just what what I say that needs to be acted on. Cause I’m a pro quo schmo kinda guy.


8 posted on 10/13/2019 10:05:35 AM PDT by BEJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

He’s right. Impeachment is political and anything goes if you have the votes, period.


10 posted on 10/13/2019 10:07:37 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (The internet has driven the world mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s foolish to argue with them.

It’s a done deal. Make them vote tomorrow.


11 posted on 10/13/2019 10:10:15 AM PDT by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The media and DNC destroyed, much to my horror, the attorney/client privilege, and now

THEY ARE WORKING ON ...FACING YOUR ACCUSER???????

NO WAY!!!


12 posted on 10/13/2019 10:10:45 AM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

OK, if there doesn’t need to be a Quid Pro Quo then what does it need to be? Just how low a bar are you going to set Adam? Hey, remember Harry Reid and the nuclear option? If you set the bar so low a snail won’t trip over it it might come back and bite you if your guy ever gets elected. Do it.


13 posted on 10/13/2019 10:11:22 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What this implies is that:

IMPEACHABLE: “Could you look into that Joe Biden business for me”

NOT IMPEACHABLE: “Could you look into that Jim Robinson business for me?

If so then simply running for office carries with it an immunity that protects you from any mention of your name to foreign leaders in connection with discussions of corruption.

Sorry, Adam, I don’t think so. And after Americans go to vote on this issue next year you will agree with me.


14 posted on 10/13/2019 10:14:27 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So true. There doesn’t need to be a quid pro quo, but if there wasn’t, there could have been and that’s enough to impeach the president. It is clearly a violation of the Constitution for a foreign government to seek good relations with the United States, and Donald Trump has betrayed his office and his oath of office for wanting good relations with a foreign country.

What an utter fool. And I am being generous.


15 posted on 10/13/2019 10:16:04 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bwahahahaha

IOW. I got nothing


16 posted on 10/13/2019 10:17:59 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The communists incl Schiff, Pelosi, news media, et al are fearful Trump will fully expose their corruption, bribery, sedition & treason.

Impeachment will be their next-to-last "hail mary" to stop Trump.

The last "hail mary" will be an "event" similar to Nov 22, 1963 when another president vowed to destroy the C_A.

"I will splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds."

Stay alert patriots!

17 posted on 10/13/2019 10:18:12 AM PDT by newfreep ("INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - DAVID HOROWITZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump’s desire to be re-elected is an impeachable offense to these spider-like squirmy, lying, disgusting, slimy ghouls.


19 posted on 10/13/2019 10:20:07 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

> “”We have discovered in short order not only the contents of that call, but also the preparatory work that went into the call. The effort to condition something the Ukrainian president deeply sought, and that was a meeting with the president to establish that this new president of Ukraine had a powerful patron in the president of the United States that was of vital importance to Ukraine, was being conditioned on digging up dirt on the Bidens,” Schiff stated on Sunday’s episode of CBS’s Face The Nation.”

What happened to the ‘parody’?

Oh, that’s ‘old news’.


20 posted on 10/13/2019 10:20:56 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Dems just figured out the quid pro quo thing wasn’t working for them. Time to move the goal posts (again)!


21 posted on 10/13/2019 10:23:30 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Or,to put it another way,there doesn't need to be a high crime *or* a misdemeanor.
23 posted on 10/13/2019 10:29:00 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (A joke: Brennan,Comey and Lynch walk into a Barr...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Geez. This whole thing is a joke.


24 posted on 10/13/2019 10:30:45 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Anticipating both of the arguments articulated by shift, for some time now I have been posting to the effect that Republicans should not start arguing from a fallback position, that is, they should argue from the get go that there is no "high crime" even if there was a quid pro quo for the reasons expressed in this reply .


27 posted on 10/13/2019 10:37:54 AM PDT by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson