[Texas Eagle]

“Hunter always understood that his father would be guided, entirely and unequivocally, by established U.S. policy, regardless of its effects on Hunter’s professional interests,”

Ah. Well, then. Perhaps this is all just one big misunderstanding. Were there rules in place during Joe Biden's vice-presidency that would have prevented Hunter from profitting from such associations? If not, then no big deal. Perhaps President Trump just assumed there were and is pointing out what he thought were illegalities.

If there were, then maybe Hunter should have informed his father of his international business dealings so-as not to jeopardize either of their freedom.

So, once again, simple question. Was it illegal or at least unethical at the time of Joe Biden's vice-presidency for Hunter Biden to profit from his father's position?

[bIlluminati]

Noting that Hunter Biden is reportedly a crack cocaine addict, what loving father would get his son a $50,000 per month no-work income knowing that he could then afford crack cocaine on a daily basis? Unless, of course, the money was diverted from Hunter to some political purpose, similar to the $900,000 from Ukraine paid on behalf of Joe Biden?