Posted on 10/11/2019 5:36:54 AM PDT by tlozo
Attorney Greg Jarrett recently wrote, “It is Pelosi and Schiff who are abusing the power of impeachment in their latest ‘witch hunt.’” This is wildly historically inaccurate. Jarrett should immediately apologize to the memory of the prosecutors of the 17th-century Massachusetts witch trials.
This is because House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Adam Schiff are currently running their Ukraine impeachment farce with far less due process than the superstitious and backwards legal system offered the “witches” of Salem.
Below are a few examples of how Jarrett has unfairly slandered the jurisprudence of 17th-century Massachusetts.
1. The Right to Be Informed of the Nature of an Accusation
In 1692, the “witches” were tried under the Witchcraft Act of 1604, or, in long-form, “An Act Against Conjuration, Witchcraft and Dealing with Evil and Wicked Spirits,” a felony. Then-President Nixon stood accused of “payment of substantial sums of money... President Bill Clinton stood accused of perjury, lying under oath.
What law is President Trump accused of violating during the Ukraine phone call? The accusations against Trump are far vaguer and never seem to relate to any statute, law, or provision of the Constitution. What little explanation there is for the “law” the president broke is extremely vague.
One fanciful theory is that the president violated 52 U.S.C. §30121 prohibiting a candidate from “soliciting” from a foreign entity a “thing of value” (meaning dirt on a political opponent) in connection with a federal election. This is the same ridiculous argument that was made in the Russia collusion hoax when Donald Trump Jr. supposedly solicited Russians for dirt on Clinton...
That argument failed in the Russia hoax for the same reason it’s wrong now: Asking for information is never a “thing of value” for purposes of election law...
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
2. The Right to Public Hearings
3. The Right to Confront and Cross-Examine Witnesses
4. A Legal Predicate
5. The Presumption of Innocence
6. Spectral Evidence
Newt hasn’t!
Bump for a great article.
Uh, what impeachment inquiry? No vote, no inquiry, no subpoenas.
It is why it is called a ‘witch hunt’, because of the Salem witch trials. They were something so stupid we cannot believe they happened.
Not that I would defend Adam Schifftless or Nazi Pelosi but this article is a bit off target because Trump is not on trial, so the 5th and 6th amendment rights are not applicable.
Technically the house is investigating.
The real problem here is that the House of Representatives is playing at being both Prosecutor and Judge when it comes to having Subpoena power.
They do not have to present probable cause to a judge that a crime has been committed before issuing a subpoena so the 4th amendment does come in to play.
But being that this is the House of Representatives they cam make up the rules as they go along. But as they are supposed to have rules and they are changing the traditional rules by not having a vote on beginning the impeachment process. They should have a vote on changing the rules.
Persons in Salem who pleaded ‘Not Guilty” of witchcraft were always found guilty and hanged.
Those who pleaded “Guilty” were fined and jailed for a while, then released.
Those arrested always had their property confiscated by the local Shire-riff, leaving their families destitute.
One man accused, refused to make a plea of “Guilty or not guilty”. To extract a plea they piled rocks on him to force a plea, his only answer was ..”More Weight!”
He died from being crushed to death, but because he never made a plea, the Shir-riff could not confiscate his goods and his family survived.
It’s fascinating that Pelosi cloaks herself in the “rule of law” when she cannot muster minimum principles of due process that attended the witch trials of Salem almost 100 years before the U.S. Constitution.
Should we dunk him in the water to see if he floats now??
Excellent article.
Ummmm no. Man that’s just stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.