What does that mean? That Joe did not overtly say that he was protecting his son when he strong-armed Ukraine into firing the prosecutor who was investigating the energy company which had inexplicably hired his unskilled son on very cushy terms?
Sorry, Julia. There is no other logical explanation for Joe’s blackmail against Ukraine.
Firing the prosecutor to protect his son from getting entangled in a corruption probe is different than protecting getting rid of the prosecutor and derailing the investigation to protect his son's paychecks.
“What does that mean? That Joe did not overtly say that he was protecting his son when he strong-armed Ukraine into firing the prosecutor who was investigating the energy company which had inexplicably hired his unskilled son on very cushy terms?”
Of course. When Biden bragged he threatened to withhold the billion dollars from Ukraine he didn’t say he wanted the prosecutor fired because he was investigating his son. Stupid libs think this gives Biden a pass.