“There is no evidence that Biden advocated for the prosecutor’s removal as a means of protecting his son.”
Julia, YOU LIE!
Guilty people say “there is no evidence”. [Mostly] innocent people say they “didn’t do it” or “it didn’t happen”.
Don’t get mad.
No one is listening to the msm or the dems anymore.
Its gotten to the point of sad, how deluded and self important the msm and dems are.
Impeachment inquiry is great for us and will die in senate.
if it eve gets there as Rs would be able to swear some folks in also
“There is no evidence that Biden advocated for the prosecutor’s removal as a means of protecting his son.”
______________
It was merely a coincidence that the Prosecutor, who just happened to be investigating Burisma, was fired within six hours of the demand by Biden. Likewise, it was another coincidence that Biden’s inexperienced, drug-addled, offspring was collecting $50K a month from the company at a time when the average monthly wage in the Ukraine was $200 a month, and Biden was in charge of Ukraine policy. Finally, it was just a coincidence that the day after the firing, the Burisma legal team met with the new Prosecutor and told him that claims of corruption by the former Prosecutor were false.
If Julia knew anything about evidence, she would know that there was and is strong circumstantial evidence of a qui pro quo. But, since that doesn’t fit with the DNC talking points, it must be ignored.
There is no evidence of Trump’s ‘doings’ either.