Backdating the whistleblower rules change? Intel IG doesn't want to answer questions about it

American Thinker ^ | 10/07/2019 | Monica Showalter

[rolling_stone]

They're trying to manipulate you.

methinks you are trying to manipulate...
it does matter when and how they changed the form it is very important, it doesn't matter which form he used there is a new form for the future.(WB#2?) if proper procedures were not followed that would point to bad act on behalf of those who changed the form, kept it secret and didn't mention it until caught..coverup? consciousness of guilt?we need to see the complete signed form, they can redack WB name. We need to know if WB is bonafide WB or not, and vet them. IMO no excuse for IG not to have briefed superiors before they got caught...

[semimojo]

I do not recall any evidence I have seen that the ICIG was correct in finding first hand knowledge.

I don't either and have no interest in defending him.

We need to know much more.

[semimojo]

it does matter when and how they changed the form it is very important,

Maybe for the next whistleblower, as you say, but they’re dishonestly trying to make us think it matters for this one.