Posted on 10/07/2019 7:29:37 AM PDT by Enlightened1
I don’t care if those countries “don’t want them back”, they don’t have a say.
Send them back.
This notion that unlawful enemy combatants are entitled to attorney’s and presumption of innocence and the rest of it is patently false and absurd on its face.
Enemy soldiers are afforded certain privileges or rights under the Hague and Geneva conventions. This requires them to carry their weapons openly, wear a recognizeable uniform, be a member of a recognized military unit with a chain of command, ID card, etc etc.
They can simply be shot on sight. There is no reason to put up with this shit. None. Other than asshat progressives who want America to lose.
Between the lines:
Turkey you are on you own in this. NATO will not rescue you from Russa, Syria, oh and the Kurds.
By the way, The CIA is going to do what they are supposed to do, arm the Kurds with stingers...
We do not want to but realize that Prisons and that whole system by and large has been Privatized and is in fact a business, a very BIG business.
____________________
Interesting. Just so you know, it looks like California might be ending private prisons:
Kurds are sunni mooselimbs, isis are mooselimbs, turks are sunni mooselimbs.
This is a tribal war among religious fanatics in the middle east, and if one group slaughters another group, I say it is a good start.
In a direct answer to your question, "What about the Kurds"?
My direct answer is, "F'm". Let them all burn in hell.
Read my tagline.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.