Impeachment: The Democrat campaign to re-elect Trump

american thinker ^ | 10/1/2019 | patricia mccarthy

[bitt]

As the release of I.G. Horowitz’s report on FISA abuse, the results of AG Barr’s investigation, and John Durham’s report on the origins of the Russia collusion hoax are about to be made public, the Democratic Party has begun to melt down in true Wicked Witch style. They are inventing new “crimes” to accuse the president of having committed each week, and each new allegation is sillier than the previous one. The entire collusion with Russia charge, as most people know by now, was fabricated by Hillary Clinton and a vast group of Deep State crooks who believed themselves to be above the law. So certain that their machinations would insure Hillary Clinton’s victory in 2016, they happily embarked on implementing their “insurance policy,” certain that their game would never come to light and they would all have both unimpeded power and job security for at least the next eight years. When their grand scheme imploded, they had to devise a cover-up plan in a hurry.

So Comey and his merry band of thugs plotted, set up meetings, wrote memos that were released to various people who saw to it that they made their way into the NYT and the WaPo. CNN and MSNBC made the hoax their main course every night for over two years. There were plenty of self-important not-journalists willing to prostrate themselves on the altar of Trump destruction and offered themselves and their services to the cause. Not one of them, it seems, gave a moment’s thought to the illegality, not to mention the immorality, of what they were doing. They hoped at first to prevent Trump’s inauguration and, failing that, have been working to see him impeached ever since. Now they are floundering, their calls for impeachment increasingly flimsier and easier

[upchuck]

Excellent point. Even better:

<img src=https://i.imgur.com/WjoG6dB.png width=50%>

Using percentage of width instead of fixed pixel width ensures this image will adapt and look good no matter the screen size or resolution.

[null and void]

If you specify ONLY the height, or ONLY the width, the aspect ratio is preserved.

A width of 500 is always a good size for the display, a percentage of a small original image may be too small to read. A ginormous image may still not fit on an ordinary screen at 50%.

I use width= instead of height= because it's one fewer keystroke.

Yes, I really am that lazy...

[timestax]

[GOPJ]

Thanks null...

:)

[GOPJ]

[Bob Ireland]

***Chalupa was a contractor hired by the DNC during the 2016 election***

At the center of this plan was Alexandra Chalupa.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

There is no one in our time ^{isn’t, and never has been, a Republican} who will ask the equivalent of “At long last, sir, have you no shame ^{and have it reverberate in journalism which is - and was - controlled by Democrats.} ”