[RatRipper]

I like Ed Henry, but that question was a very sloppy characterization of the situation with Trump and Ukraine.

[InterceptPoint]

Ed Henry: “So you’re okay with a president asking another president to dig up dirt on a candidate?”

Yes, a bit sloppy. What if Ed Henry had said this instead:

“So you’re okay with a president asking another president to investigate a candidate?”

For me that would have been fine. For Levin I’m not so sure. But the simple answer is that CANDIDACY does not equal IMMUNITY. It sure didn’t for Trump and doesn’t for Biden either.

But not to confuse anyone who thinks I am equating those two activities I’m not. The Trump Investigation was a wide and deep conspiracy based on made up evidence. The proposed Biden investigation was a simple request to add Biden to a hoped for corruption investigation by Ukraine. And you can find the justification for that request on YouTube. At least for awhile.

[ohioman]

“F” Ed henry and anyone who supports him. He has made his decision.

[NEMDF]

I agree with you.

[subterfuge]

Why do you like Ed Henry?

[Lurkinanloomin]

That question was right out of the Ministry of Propaganda playbook.
Levin was right to call him out on his dishonesty.

[FreeReign]

I like Ed Henry, but that question was a very sloppy characterization of the situation with Trump and Ukraine.

Ed Henry used the Fake News talking point and mischaracterization about "digging up dirt" in his question.

It's amazing that it's the Fox News "news" guy, Henry, who mischaracterizes while the Fox News opinion guy, Levin, has to correct him.

[TheConservativeTejano]

I like Ed Henry, but that question was a very sloppy characterization of the situation with Trump and Ukraine.

Partner, Ed Henry is part of "The Giant Sixth Grade Brain Journalists" and this guy Ed Henry should be "Tarred and Feathered" for going to the other side.

This whole scenario on Ukraine we hope goes down as a nothing burger.