SeeBS hearsay about a hearsay drama queen
Posted on 09/30/2019 4:46:07 AM PDT by Magnatron
A lawyer for the Ukraine whistleblower blasted CBS’s “60 Minutes” on Sunday for “literally making stuff up” in its reporting about a letter his legal group sent regarding their client’s safety.
In its reporting on the letter, “60 Minutes” claimed the whistleblower was under federal protection, even though that was clearly not stated in the letter.
In response, the whistleblower’s legal team published the letter and called out “60 Minutes" for their shoddy reporting.
“NEWS ALERT: 60 Minutes completely misinterpreted contents of our letter, which is now published online at https://compassrosepllc.com/intelligence-community-whistleblower-matter/ …,” attorney Mark S. Zaid tweeted. “Nor have we, as we stated earlier today, reached any agreement with Congress on contact with the whistleblower. Discussions remain ongoing.”
Rather than issuing a correction, “60 Minutes” doubled down and said it “stands by its sources and reporting on the whistleblower.”
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
Schiff writing fiction for the media again?
No “government protection”. No agreement to testify.
When will this POS be removed already???
Kind of ironic, the biteblower complaining that people are “making stuff up.”
Could little pencil neck Adam be LYING??? OMG...he NEVER lies....except when opens his mouth!
I assume that Schiff represents a lot of fellow Jews in his district.....he will NEVER be ousted.
actually there is a large percentage of Armenian-Americans in his district. it is drawn to be a safe D district no matter what.
News reports like this make me wonder if the “whistleblower” is a Trump operative whose sole purpose was to make Adam Schiff and the media look like a bunch of retarded fools.
SeeBS hearsay about a hearsay drama queen
The attorneys are going to be surprised when their star client commits suicide. They will almost be as surprised as the victim.
If Adam Schiff has a deal with the “whistleblower” to testify, why isn’t that deal public.
I personally believe the “whistleblower” will never appear before Congress. That would expose all those that provided information. That assumes there were actual firsthand informants in the US. This garbage could easily be coming from the Ukraine side.
Not “whistleblower”, just rumor/gossip passer. No first hand knowledge, just passed along office gossip.
media making stuff up. Who would have thought such a thing would happen.....
Ha Ha, even that stupid guy with the hat, Matt DRUDGE fell for the fake news. That hat must cover the hole in his head.
I don’t see how Dims get 218 votes on the floor of the House without public testimony from this guy AND his so-called sources.
Surely not even Democrats are that stupid...
Is there any law prohibiting the outing of the phony whistleblower? If there is none, why don’t we know his/her name by now? If this were reversed, you know the media would have overturning heaven and hell by now to out the patsy.
This is about abortion
They know Ginsberg is gonna croak and they don’t want Trump naming her replacement
Dems will vote in lockstep, with a large enough margin to allow a few vulnerable ones some room to vote “present”
Kind of ironic????
IT’S SUPER IRONIC.
But sure good to read that the phony whistleblower (non-existent) and his legal team are UPSET. BOO Freakin HOO.
I would think that patriotic Armenians are patriotic.
Adman Schiff IS a parody.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.