Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather

When the airwaves are involved, the federal government should have a say.

In cases of common carrier monopoly or duopoly, governments should have a say.

Neither of these exceptions applies to Twitter.


11 posted on 09/29/2019 7:14:58 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brian Griffin
Maybe I should get in on this action...


12 posted on 09/29/2019 7:20:01 PM PDT by GOP Congress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Griffin

Then Twitter should never be allowed to send it’s signals over wireless frequencies licensed for use. A television or a radio station licenses its frequencies from public airwaves of the people. Internet companies do the same. They should be subject to the same rules. If a Twitter uses the internet carriers airwaves to deliver propaganda then their should be restriction on the company.


21 posted on 09/29/2019 9:22:00 PM PDT by georgiarat (The most expensive thing in the world is a cheap Army and Navy. - Carl Vinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Griffin

Then Twitter should never be allowed to send it’s signals over wireless frequencies licensed for use. A television or a radio station licenses its frequencies from public airwaves of the people. Internet companies do the same. They should be subject to the same rules. If a Twitter uses the internet carriers airwaves to deliver propaganda then their should be restriction on the company.


22 posted on 09/29/2019 9:22:13 PM PDT by georgiarat (The most expensive thing in the world is a cheap Army and Navy. - Carl Vinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson