Or have we become too stupid, stoned on pot, dumbed down via government education systems, lazy..........?
Every stinking democrat in office is trying to remove a duly elected president. When will America realize that the democratic party is an enemy of the state?
I’ve watched Austin TX turn to crap because of liberals from CA. My God, you can’t wear a T-shirt at school that has USA on it. Because it will offend the illegal aliens.
Sorry, shit face schiff is on TV now
Or have we become too stupid, stoned on pot, dumbed down via government education systems, lazy……….?
The natural disposition is always to believe. It is acquired wisdom and experience only that teach incredulity, and they very seldom teach it enough. The wisest and most cautious of us all frequently gives credit to stories which he himself is afterwards both ashamed and astonished that he could possibly think of believing. — Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)Americans all grow up believing in the fatuous theory that journalism is objective - and that there is competition within journalism. I blanch to think how many decades it took me to get it clear in my mind that journalism was systematically slanted towards the Democrats.It should always have been clear that the wire services are virtual meetings of all major journalism outlets. “Meetings” which have been in continuous operation since the Civil War and before (Samuel Morse’s demo of the telegraph, 1844. The ancestor of the AP, 1848). Thus, the following quote from Wealth of Nations (1776) is patently applicable to journalism: “
People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.They even call the wire services the “Associated Press” or “United Press International” or such. What does it take to make clear that all major journalism is in cahoots??? The propaganda campaign which convinces people wholesale of the fatuous conceit that “journalists are objective” is, I submit, the “conspiracy against the public” which derives from the wire service journalism cartel. Nobody is naturally objective; nobody can actually be certain that their take on a particular news item is objective - no matter how many people may be with you in a mutual admiration society declaring that you are objective. But, journalists have an “out.” If they can’t be objective, they certainly can go along and get along with each other, and be unanimous. And that is exactly what they mean when they say, “objective.”And journalists know that they are negative towards society - that they are on the lookout for stories which suggest that society should be controlled more. To claim that “journalists are objective” is thus tantamount to claiming that “negativity is objective” - which can be endorsed only by a cynic.
“The republican principle demands that the deliberate sense of the community should govern the conduct of those to whom they intrust the management of their affairs; but it does not require an unqualified complaisance to every sudden breeze of passion or to every transient impulse which the people may receive from the arts of men, who flatter their prejudices to betray their interests.” ― Alexander HamiltonPeople who go along and get along with the journalism cartel are practicing on the credulity of the public.The journalism cartel must be sued into oblivion. The 1964 New York Times Co. v. Sullivan to the contrary notwithstanding. And I know that Sullivan was unanimous. The famous Morrison v. Olson decision was nearly unanimous, too - but it is famously dead wrong. The difference between the Rhenquist Court in 1988 and the Warren Court in 1964 is that the Rhenquist Court had Scalia on it, and the Warren Court didn’t.