There’s going to be a huge chain-of-custody issue if it ever becomes evidence in a US Court! I guess a prosecutor might use it as a means to leverage a subpoena of its source - the original DNC database. Its going to be interesting, instructive & likely slow!
I wonder how foreign sourced evidence is handled in US Courts. Particularly “digital” based evidence like a server!
Any FR lawyers have an opinion?
Ukraine has been trying for years to get the US to look at the crimes of Biden and son, and others, basically stealing from Ukraine funds such as from IMF, World Bank.
They allege crimes were committed and they are asking the US to look into it. Therefore, it is not a problem for evidence to be given to US authorities for review.
When Obama was in office. he had his ambassadors squelch any such investigations. When Trump got into office he was kept in the dark about a secret ring of traitorous ‘resistance’ that would not forward requests by Ukraine to investigate the crimes that were committed.
The crimes included $5 billion embezzlement by a notorious criminal Russian oligarch who cut a deal with Joe Biden. There are many crimes, Hunter Biden’s crime was relatively small and amateurish. He received laundered funds at $3 million.
Once you destroy evidence you surrender that argument.
Get the car battery, a generator, some electrical leads and demonstrate the power of electricity to the individual being interrogated.
It itself may not be useful as legal evidence, but it sure could point investigators to a lot of it.
Ask that Air-force retiree that’s started posting two months ago, the one that gives out a hostile lawyer vibe for every interaction. She might have an opinion.