[Attention Surplus Disorder]

“No evidence has emerged that Joe Biden was acting to protect his son.”

I love these kinds of statements. What form does one suppose such evidence would take?

A purchase order? A signed agreement? Is the supposition that Biden ordered the prosecutor fired to benefit his son more compelling than the supposition that Trump worked to torpedo Biden as a candidate?

[MarvinStinson]

“No evidence has emerged that Joe Biden was acting to protect his son.”

;

[vigilence]

Why else would he be put on the board of a Ukrainian gas company except that he’s the son of the now ex-vice president? No evidence required.

[Brilliant]

In the immortal words of Adam Schiff, “Of course there’s no evidence. We haven’t conducted the investigation yet.”