Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sanders proposes sweeping wealth tax, an idea highlighted by Warren
Washington Post ^ | September 24, 2019 | Sean Sullivan and Jeff Stein

Posted on 09/24/2019 8:10:21 AM PDT by C19fan

Sen. Bernie Sanders proposed a tax on the wealthiest Americans on Tuesday as way to help underwrite his slate of ambitious — and costly — policies, offering his own version of an idea one of his toughest rivals has campaigned on aggressively and pushing it further.

Sanders, a presidential candidate and independent senator from Vermont, offered his blueprint after Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who has surged in the polls, made a wealth tax one of her signature ideas. Her crowds regularly chant “two cents!” at her rallies when she brings up the idea, a reference to how much the wealthy would have to pay on the dollar.

Sanders’s proposed wealth tax is more aggressive than Warren’s and would raise more money. Warren’s plan calls for levying a 2 percent tax on wealth above $50 million, as well as a 3 percent tax on wealth above $1 billion. The relatively high threshold has helped Warren fend off critiques that large farms could be exposed to the tax.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2020; potus; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Many Europeans used to have wealth taxes. Steffi Graf and her dad got caught up on charges of trying to evade Germany's wealth tax. I used the past tense as these countries realized they did not collect anywhere near the revenue anticipated due to the target population moving to tax havens like Monaco for a lot of bureaucratic hassle and costs.

There is strong case that these wealth taxes are unconstitutional.

1 posted on 09/24/2019 8:10:21 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It worked so well in France.


2 posted on 09/24/2019 8:12:54 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Is your IRA/401K safe from these robbers? Perhaps Uncle Sam should stop giving those tax breaks once these accounts reach a certain threshold, perhaps half a million.


3 posted on 09/24/2019 8:13:37 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
If a flat-out wealth tax doesn't violate Article I, Section 9, then nothing does.

I think Roberts likely would come through on this one. You want a wealth tax, pass a constitutional amendment like they did for income taxes.

4 posted on 09/24/2019 8:14:09 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Commies.


5 posted on 09/24/2019 8:14:28 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Socialism/Communism is great....until they run out other peoples’ money.


6 posted on 09/24/2019 8:15:00 AM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

The biggest problem is it doesn’t fix anything.
If you confiscated every dime from everyone who owns more than 1B, you are still have a deficit and NEXT year you are in real trouble.

18,000 people pay 90% of the taxes to run NY State.


7 posted on 09/24/2019 8:15:39 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Yes...the UK, too. For idiots like Warren who think wealth and the people who have it is not portable are in for a rude shock. Given that wealth forms the pool for productive investment and job growth, she wants to tax an axe to the Golden Goose, but isn’t bright enough to realize it. She, and her supporters, have the economic IQ of dust.


8 posted on 09/24/2019 8:15:47 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Sanders’ wife (at least) and Warren
should have been prosecuted for their
thefts using fraud.

BUT THAT is acceptable because they are special.

By failing to prosecute, they freely confabulate
and now scheme based on their (and others’) lies.


9 posted on 09/24/2019 8:16:33 AM PDT by Diogenesis ( WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
There is strong case that these wealth taxes are unconstitutional.

Constitutional is whatever John Roberts decides it is after rolling out of bed in the morning and reading his reviews in the WaPo.


10 posted on 09/24/2019 8:20:54 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Dust would be better.


11 posted on 09/24/2019 8:25:04 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Democrats are the party of higher and higher taxes. It’s basically their main plank of the platform.


12 posted on 09/24/2019 8:29:03 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Once “taxed” (aka, stolen), what happens the following tax year?

Does the same wealth get “taxed” again? Or, is it deemed to have been “taxed”, and only new wealth subject?

Semantically, either way, it is essentially just a re-tax on previous earnings. In one case, a one-time extra tax on earnings... in the other, a yearly tax on the same earnings.


13 posted on 09/24/2019 8:30:14 AM PDT by C210N (qui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

No where in the Constitution is there permission for the government to tax wealth. Income, yes - wealth no.


14 posted on 09/24/2019 8:30:26 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

That is not how they will confiscate the wealth. They will simply require 401Ks to hold a certain % of US Treasury bonds in order to be tax free.


15 posted on 09/24/2019 8:31:50 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

The federal income tax started out as a 2 or 3 per cent tax on millionaires.

Look at the hellish nightmare THAT turned into.

How long would it take for the RATS to call for a 2% tax surcharge on those with a net worth of $200,000 or more?


16 posted on 09/24/2019 8:38:11 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Ban liberals, NOT guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

The only successful way to collect the task would be to throw the “wealthy” in concentration camps (where they cannot call their tax attorneys) and then take their money.

I wonder if that has ever been tried before?


17 posted on 09/24/2019 8:49:56 AM PDT by cgbg (Democracy dies in darkness when Bezos bans books.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Nah! It’s not like we ever had an Environmentalist that believed in Euthanasia.
There comes a time in such systems that People themselves become assets or liabilities.


18 posted on 09/24/2019 8:56:18 AM PDT by griswold3 (Democratic Socialism is Slavery by Mob Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Sanders proposes sweeping wealth tax, an idea highlighted by Warren.
More bait for the idiots who are clueless and only react to emotion.


19 posted on 09/24/2019 8:59:27 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
The relatively high threshold has helped Warren fend off critiques that large farms could be exposed to the tax.

With what the Federal Reserve has done to the value of the dollar over the last 100 years, eventually even miniature farms will be subject to the tax. How many generations should a family farm expect to be inherited?


20 posted on 09/24/2019 9:02:11 AM PDT by magooey (The Mandate of Heaven resides in the hearts of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson