Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DSEI: U.K. Crafting New Command and Control Regime as Royal Navy Grows
USNI News ^ | September 16, 2019 9:01 AM | Jon Rosamond

Posted on 09/16/2019 5:21:59 PM PDT by robowombat

DSEI: U.K. Crafting New Command and Control Regime as Royal Navy Grows

By: Jon Rosamond September 13, 2019 10:20 AM • Updated: September 16, 2019 9:01 AM

LONDON — The Royal Navy’s metamorphosis from a provider of lone warships to the world’s maritime hotspots into a service deploying carrier strike and amphibious task groups will be accompanied by an equally significant transformation in command and control (C2), according to the U.K.’s surface fleet commander.

In the most radical shake-up of its kind in a century, Rear Adm. Andy Burns forecast that large embarked headquarters will become a thing of the past.

Instead, C2 will be performed by smaller platforms using virtual networks, hardened against cyber-attack and able to function without satellite data links.

Maintaining a decisive advantage in naval operations will require capabilities “fit for the information age and in anticipation of machine-speed warfare,” he said on Thursday.

“I believe we need to change the C2 culture across the four pillars of people, processes, structures and technology.”

Addressing a naval seminar at the DSEI defense exhibition in London, Burns – who is Commander U.K. Maritime Forces and Rear Admiral Surface Ships – suggested that rank and age would become “increasingly irrelevant” in the future headquarters.

“The traditional role of commodore or admiral as the ultimate decision-maker must give way to an approach that is more to do with enabling and catalyzing,” he said. “This style of command is already beginning to shift our approach.”

In 2016 Burns became the first Royal Navy officer to command a U.S. Navy task force in the Middle East, taking charge of 5th Fleet’s CTF 50.

“I enjoyed considerable freedom to approach the task differently because the 5th Fleet commander recognized that our response to crisis needs to be instinctive rather than controlled, and unconstrained from headquarters ashore,” he said.

“Similarly, working alongside the commander [U.S.] 2nd Fleet in the Baltic earlier this year, we undertook a rigorous assessment of the extent to which we were really exercising mission command. We wanted to ensure that subordinate commanders had the freedom to harness the intellectual capacity of their own staffs and operate with autonomy within broad commander’s intent.

“I’ll be honest: there was room for improvement. But to create and maintain the C2 ecosystem we need for the future, we need to develop a culture of independent innovation and learning through failure.”

Burns said the Royal Navy will require commanders with softer skills, such as the ability to collaborate, and quoted former U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis: “In this age, I don’t care how operationally or tactically brilliant you are. If you cannot create harmony, even vicious harmony, on the battlefield, based on trust, across service lines, across coalition and national lines, and across civilian and military lines, you need to go home. Because your leadership is obsolete. We’ve got to have officers who can create harmony across all those lines.”

Bridge of Type 23, HMS Kent on April 9, 2019. UK Royal Navy Photo

Turning to the processes pillar, Burns said those officers must try to deliver outcomes rather than a linear plan. “During Exercise Joint Venture earlier this year we confirmed how counterproductive it is to focus on the phases of an off-the-shelf plan”, he told the DSEI audience.

“Our operational design in the future will apply methodology that makes sense of the complex environment but allows constant review, with adaptive tools and techniques to make the most of emerging technology.”

As far as the command structures are concerned, Burns predicted that fixed headquarters would be replaced by virtual networks.

“The need for large headquarters to be embarked in a command platform at sea is diminishing. Lighter technology will enable a fly forward capability, making a wider range of shipping suitable for supporting C2,” he said.

The new structures must be cyber resilient, he explained, and able to operate in a C2-degraded or -denied environment (C2D2E) without access to space-based services.

Commanders would have to learn to rapidly exploit automated decision-support technologies, such as data-to-decision systems, human-machine interfaces, cloud solutions and artificial intelligence.

The U.K.’s emerging Future Force operating concept – which covers the sea, land, air, space and cyber domains to 2035 – describes how C2 will undergo “the most fundamental program of reform for over 100 years,” Burns said.

“The potential for providing secure cloud-based data, connectivity and AI support will lead to a reduction in the size of our deployed headquarters and drive a revision of the methods that currently underpin mission command.”

The RN was responding swiftly to the new requirements, he said. Its recently established MarWorks information warfare technology accelerator “has already delivered some spectacular results” including C2D2E-resilient networks and low size, weight and power services.

He also noted the development of fifth-generation cloud-based technologies and said tethered unmanned air systems and Helikite aerostats could be employed for reach-back C2.

“The Royal Navy is responding to the changing character of maritime conflict and adapting its approach to C2. Only by doing so, at an ever-increasing pace, will we retain the ability to fight and win.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bojo; borisjohnson; brexit; brexitparty; europeanunion; nato; nigelfarage; unitedkingdom

1 posted on 09/16/2019 5:21:59 PM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Guessing they still haven’t sent any ships or aid to their Bahamas.


2 posted on 09/16/2019 5:37:34 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

“DSEI: U.K. Crafting New Command and Control Regime as Royal Navy Grows”

so the U.K. has now managed to get more than seven deep water vessels fully operational at the same time?


3 posted on 09/16/2019 5:52:01 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

This means that the number of British admirals will increase from more than the number of ships they have over 1,000 tons displacement to more than the number of lieutenant commanders.


4 posted on 09/16/2019 6:29:20 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud

Would the entire Royal Navy comprise a carrier strike force or amphibious task group?


5 posted on 09/17/2019 5:45:14 AM PDT by A strike (Import third world become third world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bgill

The RFA Mounts Bay was deployed to the Bahamas weeks ago to provide aid.


6 posted on 09/19/2019 1:25:54 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

From what I understand the age of cuts is over, the defence budget is going up and in the years to come there will be more hulls in the water to meet the rise in China and other potentially hostile states. The Type 31e is designed to be built quickly and to perform a general purpose role so that the higher end Type 26 ASW frigate and Type 45 Air defence destroyer can focus more on escorting the new carriers or otherwise carrying out their specialist role.


7 posted on 09/19/2019 1:29:03 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

Well, that’s one compared to how many US? How many $$$$ vs. pounds?


8 posted on 09/19/2019 7:55:18 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Are you complaining that a nation with a smaller navy and defence budget isn’t sending as many ships and aid as a much larger one?


9 posted on 09/20/2019 7:09:20 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

You know exactly what I’m complaining about. The Commonwealth has a population six times that of the US and is comprised of 34 countries with $$$$$ out the whazoo yet Liz has barely raised an eyebrow. For some reason, the US is doing more for the Bahamas than anyone.


10 posted on 09/20/2019 8:04:56 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bgill

The Commonwealth is not the Royal Navy, the Royal Navy is the naval arm of Great Britain only, so no you are talking out of your other end.

There is talk of CANZUK the confederation of the 4I countries: GB Canada, Australia & NZ but that would only result in a confederation with half the population of the US and that is a long way off (if ever).


11 posted on 09/20/2019 8:32:27 AM PDT by joegoeny ("Nuts!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: joegoeny

My other end sends a royal raspberry.


12 posted on 09/20/2019 9:40:40 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Considering that this happened in America’s back yard and has the world.s largest navy, it would be a bit odd if it wasn’t providing most of the aid. The British naval service always has ships from the Royal Navy and Royal Fleet Auxiliary on standby during hurricane season to provide relief for people afflicted. Obviously, the contribution will be dwarfed by those of a country that has an economy more than 5 times the size, a navy bigger than every other navy combined and much closer to the afflicted area. I’m not sure what it is you think we aren’t doing that we should be doing.


13 posted on 09/20/2019 9:58:33 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

You’d think that actually getting planes on the Carrier would be a higher priority than yet another reorganization


14 posted on 09/24/2019 11:35:35 AM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson