Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I read the whole thing on my phone's browser. The rumor is just more desperation wishful thinking by the fake-news-industrial swamplex. McCarthy knows from whence he speaks, and he speaks well.
1 posted on 09/16/2019 7:54:15 AM PDT by Eleutheria5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Eleutheria5

They’re just setting up the narrative of political persecution.

Since they said this, when the indictment does come down, they’ll screech and howl about how there was a no-bill and prosecutors only pushed for an indictment to keep the right happy.


2 posted on 09/16/2019 7:56:37 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5
While conceding that he “do[es] not know the specific basis for the rumors,” Bromwich intuits that they must be reliable because the newspapers ran with the story.

LOL

5 posted on 09/16/2019 8:08:37 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

It’s not certain that a grand jury has taken up the case.


8 posted on 09/16/2019 8:19:26 AM PDT by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

Some people have tried to argue a DC Jury would never convict. I disagree. A good prosecutor should have no problem demonstrating to everyone’s satisfaction the conspirators are DIRTY COPS. My guess is any DC Jury would love to get their hands on dirty cops.


9 posted on 09/16/2019 8:19:48 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

Unless the Grand Jury is seated someplace between Altoona, PA and the CA-NV border, I refuse to believe that it will actually indict a Swamper.


10 posted on 09/16/2019 8:20:42 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

Dream on! Nobody is getting indicted.


11 posted on 09/16/2019 8:21:18 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

The Coup Cabal is desperate. Trying to manage the narrative


15 posted on 09/16/2019 8:34:15 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the cloudsi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

If they just met.....then they haven’t heard the case yet and there is no indictment....yet....duh...


19 posted on 09/16/2019 8:41:25 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

Then end all the speculation by indicting McCabe.


20 posted on 09/16/2019 8:46:02 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

Even if indicted the jurors will find their cats killed and children threatened. This is the FBI don’t forget.


21 posted on 09/16/2019 8:46:24 AM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

McCarthy is wrong. Grand juries vote “no bills” all the time, and McCarthy is being either dishonest or doesn’t know what he is talking about. Because he was a federal prosecutor, it could be either one.

Prosecutors ask grand juries to return a “no bill” so they can blame the grand jury as a cover for the prosecutor’s actual motives.

Would anybody be surprised if the prosecutors in the McCabe case said: “Oh gosh, gee whiz, that terrible old grand jury refused to indict! Oh well, it is all out of our hands! The people have spoken!”

Political favor done, no tracks left behind, all on the “up and up”. Right, Andy?


36 posted on 09/16/2019 10:34:12 AM PDT by Gratia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

How did that letter go????

“I demand you tell me they didn’t indict me, and don’t do it again!!”

huh???


39 posted on 09/16/2019 11:39:18 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

Indictment is one thing. Trial and conviction is something else. Pull the jury from somewhere other than DC, Southern Maryland, Northern Virginia and there’s a chance he’s convicted.

If the jury comes from the DC metro area, where 90% voted for her, McCabe is walking.


41 posted on 09/16/2019 12:12:45 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

Here is my assessment. McCabe played his hand as the Gambler in the popular Kenny Rodgers song. You have to know when to hold them, know when to fold them, know when to walk away, know when to run. McCabe played his hand right up to the moment when he had to show his cards or fold big time and there was no way for him to walk away or run. So, he folded and became a canary. Now, his fortunes will turn on who can deliver and my guess he can deliver the whole stinking cabal all the way to the very top. Next to pedos, life expectancy in prison is not great for a dirty cop.


42 posted on 09/16/2019 12:21:19 PM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

I guess this is Fox’s way of getting hits for an article that was published in the National Review. McCarthy is one of the only guys I read there.

Here’s a direct link for those not interested in clicking twice to get to the article.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/09/why-its-unlikely-the-mccabe-grand-jury-voted-against-indictment/


44 posted on 09/16/2019 1:20:15 PM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

In the more than 162,500 cases prosecuted by U.S. attorneys from 2009 to 2010, grand juries voted not to return an indictment in only 11, according to data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics — equivalent to one in 14,759 cases, or 0.0068 percent.

I believe actually 193,000 cases presented us attorneys declined 30,000 11 no true bill...more details at washington post which i dont subscribe to thus this blurb from yahoo

https://news.yahoo.com/ferguson-federal-grand-jury-indictment-statistics-history-134942645.html


47 posted on 09/16/2019 5:11:01 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no justice no peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

In the more than 162,500 cases prosecuted by U.S. attorneys from 2009 to 2010, grand juries voted not to return an indictment in only 11, according to data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics — equivalent to one in 14,759 cases, or 0.0068 percent.

I believe actually 193,000 cases presented us attorneys declined 30,000 11 no true bill...more details at washington post which i dont subscribe to thus this blurb from yahoo

https://news.yahoo.com/ferguson-federal-grand-jury-indictment-statistics-history-134942645.html


48 posted on 09/16/2019 5:11:06 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no justice no peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson