Posted on 09/12/2019 1:32:16 PM PDT by Morgana
An Amsterdam-based abortionist who prescribes abortion pills to clients over the internet is suing the FDA for seizing abortion pills she illegally prescribed to U.S. patients after she violated an FDA cease and desist letter.
Dr. Rebecca Gomperts, an abortionist who once plied her trade by boat but later moved her business model to the internet and even drones, together with her lawyer Richard Hearn, filed the federal lawsuit in Idaho Monday. Gomperts claims that by cracking down on the illegal distribution of abortion pills, the government is denying women a constitutionally protected right to terminate their unwanted pregnancies.
Gomperts believes that the governments enforcement of the law is a form of intimidation that is quite severe, according to NPR, a news organization that has published a series of reports this year apparently designed to raise questions about the FDAs restrictions on the abortion pill. I would say a form of bullying. And so I think its very important to stand up against it, Gomperts added.
Currently, the FDA has placed mifepristone in the database (called REMS) that allows only doctors who are able to give appropriate screening and follow-up care to their patients to prescribe the abortion pill. As Live Action News has reported, removing safeguards puts women at greater risk of complications, including the risk of undiagnosed ectopic pregnancy, which can be fatal. In addition, less regulation of the pill could make women more vulnerable to abuse, rape, and human trafficking. And a Live Action investigative series has shown that several organizations who stand to profit financially have been backing biased studies designed to build a case against the FDAs REMS restrictions.
An Amsterdam-based abortionist who prescribes abortion pills to clients over the internet is suing the FDA for seizing abortion pills she illegally prescribed to U.S. patients after she violated an FDA cease and desist letter.
Dr. Rebecca Gomperts, an abortionist who once plied her trade by boat but later moved her business model to the internet and even drones, together with her lawyer Richard Hearn, filed the federal lawsuit in Idaho Monday. Gomperts claims that by cracking down on the illegal distribution of abortion pills, the government is denying women a constitutionally protected right to terminate their unwanted pregnancies.
Gomperts believes that the governments enforcement of the law is a form of intimidation that is quite severe, according to NPR, a news organization that has published a series of reports this year apparently designed to raise questions about the FDAs restrictions on the abortion pill. I would say a form of bullying. And so I think its very important to stand up against it, Gomperts added.
Currently, the FDA has placed mifepristone in the database (called REMS) that allows only doctors who are able to give appropriate screening and follow-up care to their patients to prescribe the abortion pill. As Live Action News has reported, removing safeguards puts women at greater risk of complications, including the risk of undiagnosed ectopic pregnancy, which can be fatal. In addition, less regulation of the pill could make women more vulnerable to abuse, rape, and human trafficking. And a Live Action investigative series has shown that several organizations who stand to profit financially have been backing biased studies designed to build a case against the FDAs REMS restrictions.
READ: Former FDA Commissioner wants to relax abortion pill restrictions. This is a very bad idea.
Gomperts is escalating her response to the government after the FDA sent Gomperts organizations, AidAccess and Women on Waves, a cease and desist letter back in March. Although Gomperts complied for a few months, in May she notified the FDA of her intent to continue her operation. The FDA has since seized packages, and Gomperts lawsuit claims she believes the government has blocked payments from some patients. In remarks made to the Associated Press, Gomperts lawyer Hearn bizarrely claimed that the FDA blocking drugs like insulin is acceptable, but if you block a woman or a 14- or 15-year-old girl who only has a couple of weeks when she can take these pills and you seize them? Thats not only unconscionable, its unconstitutional.
The lawsuit complains that the FDAs restrictions are an undue burden on the rights of U.S. women to terminate their unwanted pregnancies during the early stages of their pregnancies. In the NPR story, Gomperts likens the abortion pill to a miscarriage and claims that women have been dealing with miscarriages forever.
But abortion pill advocates own studies on the pills safety assume that women are properly screened by a medical professional who can confirm a properly dated uterine pregnancy. Even according to pro-abortion organizations, medical best practice includes accurately dating a pregnancy and ruling out an ectopic pregnancy, as mifepristone is not effective for ectopic pregnancies, and missed ectopic pregnancies can be fatal. Abortion pill activists like Gomperts are defying their own logic and putting women in danger by seeking to remove the FDAs protocols.
And since women who receive the pills are frequently instructed to lie if they have complications, it has become difficult to track the adverse effects from the pills, which have to date killed at least 24 women and injured thousands more.
Hello? Is this thing on? **TAP TAP TAP**
This whacked out feminist from Holland is trying to mail baby killing pills to this country and it's illegal now she wants to sue our FDA because she can't.
Dr. Rebecca Gomperts you are not an American citizen, you are not a doctor here in America you have no right to be doing what you are doing. If American women want to come to Holland, visit your office and take your baby killing pills well we can't stop them. However you do not send them by US mail to our soil. What you are doing is an act of war. Sending pills that kill our babies is an act of war.
We don't want your baby killing drugs
Please site the Article, section and clause of the Constitution that protects the right to murder the unborn.
“Please site the Article, section and clause of the Constitution that protects the right to murder the unborn. “
She can’t! She’s not a US Citizen. She’s Dutch!
Shed kill fewer people if she would switch to shipping fentanyl instead.
Sick but true
No, Libs have the right to do want ever they want. Stopping them is the crime!
Every Dutchman I have ever known is an asshole, with a capital ASS/HOLE.
Also usually dumber than a box of rocks.
we need a Constitutional amendment that states that foreign citizens have zero access to U.S. civil courts EXCEPTING a foreign party to a valid, written U.S. contract between the that foreign party and a U.S. party to the contract. period.
During WWII, the Dutch doctors defied the occupying Nazis and would not cooperate with Euthanasia or human experimentation.
But, the corruption of the best is the worst.
My wife is very glad that her grandfather left the Netherlands after the war to make his own way in Canada.
She once had a desire to see Holland and meet distant relatives. No more.
Should foreigners really be able to sue the United States government?
Isn’t that what the 14th. Amendment is about?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.