Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court allows nationwide enforcement of new Trump asylum rules
Washington Times ^ | September 11, 2019 | Stephen Dinan and Alex Swoyer

Posted on 09/11/2019 3:24:33 PM PDT by rdl6989

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: Syncro
In other words, Trump does NOT have to obey them

I have been saying that since the first Oregon judge shut down his Muzzy restrictions and did I ever get reamed by the jailhouse lawyers that infect this site.

81 posted on 09/12/2019 5:06:42 AM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“Why in God’s name would they dissent. It’s based on existing law.”

They KNOW they are at war against America and all for which we stand.


82 posted on 09/12/2019 5:41:14 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pox

I don’t know if anyone else saw this, but well over a year ago, someone posted at serious article that ran the argument, that the US, Mexico and other countries had subscribed to some agreement, (Geneva or something), that clearly said that asylum seekers must apply for asylum at the first country they enter.

This would basically preclude anyone seeking asylum from countries South of Mexico.

This was clear established International Law.

Okay, here we are a year or more later, and they finally get around to implementing it.

THE ONLY EXPLANATION FOR ANY OF THIS, IS THE FACT THAT TRUMP’S HANDS WERE TIED FROM THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION, PLUS NOT HAVING GOP SUPPOETERS IN CONGRESS WITH THE GUTS TO HELP HIM OUT.

There is no excuse why Paul Ryan, didn’t include the 5 billion in the omnibus bill in 2016 or again 2018.


83 posted on 09/12/2019 6:10:14 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Bookmarked!


84 posted on 09/12/2019 6:11:12 AM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pox

7 to 2? Wow!


85 posted on 09/12/2019 6:11:29 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Should have been 9 to 0.


86 posted on 09/12/2019 6:13:53 AM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Superb


87 posted on 09/12/2019 6:20:04 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

It was not even mentioned on GMA this morning, but the previous day they had the headline about the judge in the 9th Circus that had stopped it.................


88 posted on 09/12/2019 6:26:29 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Me too.

In fact every time some leftist judge did something like this I would tweet to Trump that he could ignore the “ruling”

Of course his tweet readers most likely did not pass on my sage advice to him.

Finally it’s out in the open.

‘Bout time.


89 posted on 09/12/2019 7:28:36 AM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

The Dimwits will be demanding a larger Supreme Court to over rule the conservative voters on the Court. All hell is going to freeze over.


90 posted on 09/12/2019 4:38:32 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (We are living in the Last Days. The Bible says so, and I believe it!! Know Him now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Following the law. What a concept.


91 posted on 09/12/2019 5:42:53 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
"Why in God’s name would they dissent. It’s based on existing law."

Because they're pieces of commie dog excrement.??

92 posted on 09/13/2019 6:03:56 AM PDT by unread (Joe McCarthy was right.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson