So now we're justifying corporate abuse in support of thwarting our Constitutional rights, based on hypothetical scenarios.
Clearly using that logic Wal-Mart could just implement "hysteria-free zones" in their stores or post "No Hysteria Allowed" signs at their entrances. Problem solved!
Yeah, ok, wiseguy.
How old are you, twelve?
Please explain how concealed carry violates your 2A rights.
The way I see it, is you can choose to simply & quietly *exercise* your 2nd Amendment right to be prepared for self defense in ANY *hypothetical scenario* by carrying your weapon discreetly— concealed.
(Funny you’d be so snarky about *hypotheticals*— isn’t any scenario hypothetical until it happens? And isn’t that why you’d carry at all?
By carrying concealed, the *particular* hypotheticals I mention WOULD NOT HAPPEN AT ALL. Open carry virtually guarantees that it COULD.)
But, hey, do it your way.
Insist on essentially hanging a sign around your neck announcing what a hotshot macho guy you are, while daring the eeeevil “corporate abusers” (who are simply trying to run a business safely & efficiently without unnecessary incidents & without violating anyone’s rights) to challenge you, as well as actually inviting the “hypothetical” (actually quite plausible) scenarios I mention) to present themselves— so you can argue and maybe even get an opportunity to escalate the argument into a shooting situation.
Because that would certainly prove what a macho guy you are.
The way I see it, people with common sense quietly PREPARE OURSELVES for any *scenario* that could arise, but *quietly* go about our business without drawing attention to ourselves.
We don’t waste time arguing with idiots.