[fwdude]

In Texas, they’ll have to post a valid Sect. 30.07 poster at their entrance to gain compliance. Otherwise, tough sh**. I can carry anywhere I want.

[No.6]

>In Texas, they’ll have to

Michigan is similar:

A private property owner has the right to prohibit individuals from carrying firearms on his or her property, whether concealed or otherwise, and regardless of whether the person is a CPL holder. If a person remains on the property after being told to leave by the owner, the person may be charged with trespassing (MCL 750.552).

tl;dr: Same deal. A PR blurb or news article doesn’t make it so. However, a sign does, or the store owner requesting you leave suffices. I have no info as to whether any such incidents have occurred in MI.

I have heard anecdotally that a nearby Walmart was divesting itself of its firearms at below-wholesale prices.

[Svartalfiar]

In Texas, they’ll have to post a valid Sect. 30.07 poster at their entrance to gain compliance. Otherwise, tough sh**. I can carry anywhere I want.

Actually, with the new laws it seems those aren't that effective. I'd hate to be a test case, but HB 121 adds subsections g/h to 30.06/07 that add a defense to prosecution for being orally told the location is 30.06/07, and you promptly leave.

So I think it's supposed to just be for people who "don't notice" the signs posted, but the wording basically means that the signs have no legal bearing until you're told about them, and then, and only then, would I suggest that you be sure to leave the premises.