Ithering Blidiot.
Listening to Biden’s remarks tells me he is actually the father of AOC.
Why not ban cars too Joe, they kill far more people than people pulling the trigger on guns.
Joe should be pushing for more drug busts. But come to think of it, then he might start making sense.
I move to ban a Biden brain that can hold more than one complete thought. O, wait! Joe Biden’s brain never held a complete thought and is incapable. Keep thinking Joe. That’s what you’re good at.
He was all for sending weapons to the mexican drug cartels to murder hundreds of men, women and 16 schoolchildren.
I think the correct answer will be - there is no difference. Turn 'em ALL in, folks!
So he's against the 1st Amendment eh. That should really get him a lot of votes. /s
That idiot obviously doesn’t know a Kalashnikov from a Charleville.
The guys at Fightlite will be working overtime.
Concealed carry won't be that useful, but if everyone has an SAW or some other type of belt fed weapon in their garage we should still be able to perform our obligations to the militia if needed.
It might be a reasonable regulation to require people owning belt fed weapons in calibers above 7.62mm to take a safety course. That would be particularly relevant for 20mm or 30mm guns.
Creepy Uncle Joe has ruled out using multiple brain cells at a time...
He’s also trying to ban skulls that hold more than one brain cell.
So far there’s him, AOC, Maxine Waters and every demonrat candidate for president.
Joe’s Chinese communist handlers have no handle on him, but his heart at least is still with them in having a defenseless citizenry to control.
California requires that all firearm transactions take place through a Federal Firearms Licensee. What could possibly be wrong with that?
I'll tell you.
One: the anti-gunners will do everything in their power to shut down legal gun dealers and prohibit anyone from opening up a gun store. They will outlaw gun shows on public property. They will mandate a myriad of regulations for gun dealers to observe regarding signage, testing, record-keeping, hands-off displays, security, and advertising. They will use zoning laws to prevent opening new gun dealerships.
Two: They will use the bureaucratic machinery created for dealerships to tack on additional record-keeping charges, waiting periods, rosters of permitted guns, abitrary definitions of prohibited guns, and limits on purchases.
Three: They will expand the use of firearm background checks to include purchase of ammunition, effectively banning internet mail order sales.
Four: They will expand the causes of official disarmament and use the firearm registration system they created to raid firearm owner's homes and confiscate their guns.
Five: They will burden the prospective gun owner with licensing requirements that change from year to year and which expire periodically, costing the consumer even more money than already spent on the prior infringements. They will also include requrements for "approved gun storage" devices. Gun manufacturers will find themselves supplying gun locks with every gun. This will result in every gun owner with a safe having a bag full of useless gun locks. Useless, in part, because only new locks may be used to take home a gun. You can't use one from your bag of useless locks.
Six: Since the state is already prepared to register all guns, the state will mandate that all personally made firearms must be marked to government standards with a government issued serial number and registered with the state.
Seven: The complexity of all the regulations above will result in even more gun dealers going out of business. Many of those who remain in business will refuse some legal transactions because they know it is only the ignorance of the legislature which has allowed such transactions to occur. Those dealers don't want trouble with the bureaucrats. This is the reason that I deal almost exclusively with a dealer sixty miles from my home. That means I end up making two one-hundred and twenty mile trips for each purchase due to the ten-day "cooling off period". After all, the state wouldn't want me to use a new gun to commit a crime. Nevermind that I already own guns AND THEY KNOW THAT. I still have to wait ten days.
Seven: Having implemented a roster of acceptable guns, the state will then begin adding additional features that must be present to make a gun acceptable. Two of those features are a magazine disconnect so that the gun can't fire with the magazine removed. The other is a loaded chamber indicator so that a person might think a gun is unloaded without checking the chamber. The state has also mandated that future guns mark ejected casings using microscopic features on the firing pin, a capability not available in the marketplace.
The State of California would claim that nothing in this entire mess is an "infringement" of the right to keep and bear arms. With our new anti-gun Governor, they are just getting started.
If someone in Odessa is reading this, please inform the Chief.
Joe; If you want to ban magazines that can hold a lot of bullets in them, then start with what is left of Newsweek and TIME. Next, the NY Times and Wash. Post, “Full Metal Jacket” containers.
I camm for banning magazines with Michelle Obama on the cover. But that’s just me...
Gotta find a single-bullet mag before they’re all gone...
There will be a day when we have Ray Guns and the left will try to govern or outright ban light beams.