Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Black Lives Matter is moving into the schools
NY Post ^ | August 29 2019 | Peter Myers

Posted on 08/29/2019 11:24:19 PM PDT by knighthawk

In a few tumultuous years, Black Lives Matter has become the progressive left’s primary vehicle for anti-racist activism. Now, through the efforts of activist teachers, BLM is moving beyond street protests to establish a growing presence in the nation’s public schools.

The initiative began in Seattle, where teachers organized a “Black Lives Matter at School Day,” in October, 2016. News of the event spread, and after the National Education Association adopted a resolution of endorsement, BLM at School Day became the BLM at School National Week of Action, to be held annually the first week of February to set the tone for Black History Month.

In 2018, school districts in more than 20 major cities, including New York, Philadelphia, Washington, DC, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles and Seattle incorporated BLM at School Week into their curricula, and still more participated this year.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blacklivesmatter; blm; schools
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 08/29/2019 11:24:20 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I’m guessing most of them don’t have a high school diploma. Can’t they see the irony?


2 posted on 08/30/2019 12:19:02 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Great. Just peachy keen.


3 posted on 08/30/2019 2:18:57 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is Mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And....Today, millions of conservatives will send their precious children into these K-12indoctrination camps.


4 posted on 08/30/2019 3:24:08 AM PDT by wintertime (I shun government K-12 teachers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
If your car breaks down in this neighborhood, don't expect people to approach you with their hands up like this.


5 posted on 08/30/2019 3:51:05 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

When your only truly original contribution to
society is peanut butter it’s easy to feel insecure


6 posted on 08/30/2019 3:57:25 AM PDT by Phil DiBasquette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk; E. Pluribus Unum

BLM is built upon the lie of “hands up, don’t shoot” with Michael Brown in Ferguson, which never happened, as the grand jury and Holder DOJ report show us. The Left’s whole racial agitation schtick is built on lies.

TWENTY FIVE TOP QUOTES FROM THE DOJ’S REPORT ON THE MICHAEL BROWN SHOOTING

http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/doj_report_on_shooting_of_michael_brown_1.pdf

[01] The evidence, when viewed as a whole, does not support the conclusion that Wilson’s uses of deadly force were “objectively unreasonable” under the Supreme Court’s definition. (Page 5)

[02] when the store clerk tried to stop Brown, Brown used his physical size to stand over him and forcefully shove him away. (Page 6)

[03] Wilson was aware of the theft and had a description of the suspects as he encountered Brown and Witness 101. (Page 6)

[04] Autopsy results and bullet trajectory, skin from Brown’s palm on the outside of the SUV door as well as Brown’s DNA on the inside of the driver’s door corroborate Wilson’s account that during the struggle, Brown used his right hand to grab and attempt to control Wilson’s gun. (Page 6)

[05] there is no credible evidence to disprove Wilson’s account of what occurred inside the SUV. (Page 7)

[06] autopsy results confirm that Wilson did not shoot Brown in the back as he was running away because there were no entrance wounds to Brown’s back. (Page 7)

[07] witnesses who originally stated Brown had his hands up in surrender recanted their original accounts (Page 8)

[08] several witnesses stated that Brown appeared to pose a physical threat to Wilson as he moved toward Wilson. (Page 8)

[09] The physical evidence also establishes that Brown moved forward toward Wilson after he turned around to face him. The physical evidence is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. (Page 10)

[10] evidence does not establish that it was unreasonable for Wilson to perceive Brown as a threat while Brown was punching and grabbing him in the SUV and attempting to take his gun. (Page 11)

[11] Wilson’s account is corroborated by physical evidence and that his perception of a threat posed by Brown is corroborated by other eyewitnesses (Page 12)

[12] Wilson’s account was consistent with those results, and consistent with the accounts of other independent eyewitnesses, whose accounts were also consistent with the physical evidence. Wilson’s statements were consistent with each other in all material ways, and would not be subject to effective impeachment for inconsistencies or deviation from the physical evidence.8 Therefore, in analyzing all of the evidence, federal prosecutors found Wilson’s account to be credible. (Page 16)

[13] Witness accounts suggesting that Brown was standing still with his hands raised in an unambiguous signal of surrender when Wilson shot Brown are inconsistent with the physical evidence, are otherwise not credible because of internal inconsistencies, or are not credible because of inconsistencies with other credible evidence. (Page 78)

[14] Multiple credible witnesses corroborate virtually every material aspect of Wilson’s account and are consistent with the physical evidence. (Page 78)

[15] several of these witnesses stated that they would have felt threatened by Brown and would have responded in the same way Wilson did. (Page 82)

[16] there are no witnesses who could testify credibly that Wilson shot Brown while Brown was clearly attempting to surrender. (Page 83)

[17] There is no witness who has stated that Brown had his hands up in surrender whose statement is otherwise consistent with the physical evidence. (Page 83)

[18] The media has widely reported that there is witness testimony that Brown said “don’t shoot” as he held his hands above his head. In fact, our investigation did not reveal any eyewitness who stated that Brown said “don’t shoot.” (Page 83)

[19] Wilson did not know that Brown was not armed at the time he shot him, and had reason to suspect that he might be when Brown reached into the waistband of his pants as he advanced toward Wilson. (Page 84)

[20] Wilson did not have time to determine whether Brown had a gun and was not required to risk being shot himself in order to make a more definitive assessment.

[21] In addition, even assuming that Wilson definitively knew that Brown was not armed, Wilson was aware that Brown had already assaulted him once and attempted to gain control of his gun. (Page 85)

[22] Wilson has a strong argument that he was justified in firing his weapon at Brown as he continued to advance toward him and refuse commands to stop, and the law does not require Wilson to wait until Brown was close enough to physically assault Wilson. (Page 85)

[23] we must avoid substituting our personal notions of proper police procedure for the instantaneous decision of the officer at the scene. We must never allow the theoretical, sanitized world of our imagination to replace the dangerous and complex world that policemen face every day.” (Page 85)

[24] “It may appear, in the calm aftermath, that an officer could have taken a different course, but we do not hold the police to such a demanding standard.” (citing Gardner v. Buerger, 82 F.3d 248, 251 (8th Cir. 1996) (same))). Rather, where, as here, an officer points his gun at a suspect to halt his advance, that suspect should be on notice that “escalation of the situation would result in the use of the firearm.” Estate of Morgan at 498. An officer is permitted to continue firing until the threat is neutralized. See Plumhoff v. Rickard, 134 S.Ct. 2012, 2022 (2014) (“Officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended”). For all of the reasons stated, Wilson’s conduct in shooting Brown as he advanced on Wilson, and until he fell to the ground, was not objectively unreasonable and thus not a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. (Page 85)

[25] Given that Wilson’s account is corroborated by physical evidence and that his perception of a threat posed by Brown is corroborated by other eyewitnesses, to include aspects of the testimony of Witness 101, there is no credible evidence that Wilson willfully shot Brown as he was attempting to surrender or was otherwise not posing a threat. (Page 86)

For the reasons set forth above, this matter lacks prosecutive merit and should be closed.

Hat tip to E. Pluribus Unum for the above.


7 posted on 08/30/2019 4:10:22 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phil DiBasquette

LOL!


8 posted on 08/30/2019 4:37:21 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

This is awesome!

White kids are going to be so indoctrinated and meek that they will do whatever the white haters want.


9 posted on 08/30/2019 4:43:14 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phil DiBasquette

LMAO! Genius!


10 posted on 08/30/2019 5:07:27 AM PDT by FrdmLvr (They never thought she would lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Phil DiBasquette; EEGator
I prefer Skippy, not Sambo:


11 posted on 08/30/2019 5:34:56 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (Quit calling them liberals, progs, socialists, or democrats. Call them what they are: COMMUNISTS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

To bad they don’t really care about blackvotes lives. They’re just one more deceptive socialist group.


12 posted on 08/30/2019 5:35:10 AM PDT by Retvet (Retvet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

EVERYTHING that has metastasized in our culture was incubated in the schools.

So I ask once again, Betsy DeVos, just what in the hell ARE you doing to earn your paycheck?


13 posted on 08/30/2019 6:54:58 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
So I ask once again, Betsy DeVos, just what in the hell ARE you doing to earn your paycheck?

Totally agree. Our education system is perhaps the largest swamp. I can only hope they are ready to make huge reforms the day after Trump is reelected. This swamp is bigger than Washington's swamp and perhaps they feel lopping the head off public schools will frighten too many soccer moms before an election.

14 posted on 08/30/2019 6:57:34 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

“Black Lives Matter at School Day,”

Sure sounds like a Racist, Separatist group of thugs to me.


15 posted on 08/30/2019 7:00:33 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

The quickest and most effective thing you can do to reform k-12 education is break the Ed degree monopoly over teaching. Issue a policy statement that in all school districts that receive federal money that a degree in a an academic discipline is sufficient for teaching in a public school. particular if they are to teach that discipline.
Maybe a year of probationary teaching and then review. Though I am very reluctant to give the educrats any ability to sign-off success or not of an individual.

The next thing is to ban forced union - NEA/AFT membership & collective bargaining. Much harder to do, because it would require 50 state legislative actions.


16 posted on 08/30/2019 7:10:00 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Reily
The quickest and most effective thing you can do to reform k-12 education

Is to encourage competition via tax deductible school vouchers and a freeze on school property taxes.

17 posted on 08/30/2019 7:20:56 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I agree with that too.


18 posted on 08/30/2019 7:23:06 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

More sanctioned child abuse for kids going to public schools.

Yet people will drop their kids off at a public school to be abused mentally and phyiscally.

Then they might complain about how their children are treated in public schools and still keep them there.


19 posted on 08/30/2019 7:26:12 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Here's the Formula: Hatred + Government + Disarmed Civilians = Genocide !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Today, millions of conservatives will send their precious children into these K-12 indoctrination camps.

Where their children will be abused mentally and physically!


20 posted on 08/30/2019 7:27:47 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Here's the Formula: Hatred + Government + Disarmed Civilians = Genocide !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson