[x]

The effect is real. The numbers are ridiculous.

78 million is over half the number of votes cast in the presidential election.

If the guy is counting every vote in every separate election that may have been changed by google searches, it's more possible, but still, using such numbers makes the guy sound like an idiot.

[lepton]

If the guy is counting every vote in every separate election that may have been changed by google searches, it’s more possible, but still, using such numbers makes the guy sound like an idiot.

---

The article directly states that is what is being referred to. That said, until I read down to that part, I had the same skepticism you did. Oh, and Sara Carter is a woman.

[Tellurian]

"spread across hundreds of local and regional races"

It seems he's counting vote marks. One voter could have been persuaded by Google searches to choose half a dozen particular candidates. That would be 6 of those 78 million.

[InterceptPoint]

If the guy is counting every vote in every separate election that may have been changed by google searches, it’s more possible, but still, using such numbers makes the guy sound like an idiot.
+++++
But that is exactly what he was doing. Remember how we seemed to lose every close race in 2018? Could be the Google Tax working it’s evil.

[SuperSonic]

These are not only votes for president, but also include hundreds of local and regional races.

The New Mind Control

[Eagles6]

That’s what it said. May have been talking worldwide too. Not clear.