Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: i_robot73

I believe SCOTUS will favor eliminating the anchor babies - the intent, or purpose, of the original law will push it through.


40 posted on 08/23/2019 2:21:42 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said theoal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: elpadre

>
I believe SCOTUS will favor eliminating the anchor babies - the intent, or purpose, of the original law will push it through.
>

R-I-G-H-T. ‘Cuz their track-record re: plain English, let alone ‘intent’, has been *spectacular*

“..shall NOT be infringed.” - the (R)N(C) ‘golden-child’ thus proclaims ‘Rights are not absolute.’

O’Care - re-written from the bench.

CONSTANTLY needing *only* one more ‘flip’ from their Oaths (& basic English reading\comprehension) & more Rights\Freedom+ get trampled.


46 posted on 08/24/2019 6:55:37 AM PDT by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson