To: BeauBo
This is a project replacing already existing old-wall. This is not new miles of wall.
21 posted on
08/22/2019 9:21:43 PM PDT by
Taipei
To: Taipei
Almost all of the 95 miles starting up in the Rio Grande Valley will be “new” miles.
22 posted on
08/22/2019 10:37:55 PM PDT by
BeauBo
To: Taipei
The “old wall” is the equivalent of “no wall.” Ineffective. The PSP (Marston Mat) works fine for landing helicopters on. But was not designed to be placed in an upright position and used as a “fence.” Chain link? Bolt cutters render it useless. Fence pliers, etc. Thus, the “new wall” will be just the barrier we need. From sea to shining sea.
30 posted on
08/23/2019 5:53:56 AM PDT by
donozark
(We Build the Wall Inc. (Check it out))
To: Taipei
I thought that way too, but a lot of existing wall is substandard and in key urban areas. I believe Pres. Trump is getting the best value for the dollar!
32 posted on
08/23/2019 11:08:36 AM PDT by
joegoeny
("Nuts!")
To: Taipei
I thought that way too, but a lot of existing wall is substandard and in key urban areas. I believe Pres. Trump is getting the best value for the dollar!
33 posted on
08/23/2019 11:08:38 AM PDT by
joegoeny
("Nuts!")
To: Taipei; BeauBo
This is a project replacing already existing old-wall. This is not new miles of wall.
Another bull-shit post.
The so-called "existing wall" wasn't stopping anyone.
Therefore, logically, it wasn't a wall, but an excuse for a wall.
The NEW wall will stop the illegals.
Stop supporting the Left with your nonsense.
36 posted on
08/23/2019 11:03:37 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Taipei
Hey, troll-boi. The old wall wasn’t effective, or it wouldn’t have needed replacing.
Otherwise, why are all the usual suspects getting their panties in a bunch over this?
39 posted on
08/25/2019 5:54:22 AM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson